Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19251891›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2009

Evaluation of single-nucleotide primer extension for detection and typing of phylogenetic markers used for investigation of microbial communities.

Marcell Nikolausz, Antonis Chatzinotas, András Táncsics, Gwenaël Imfeld, Matthias Kästner

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcell NikolauszUFZ Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany. marcell.nikolausz@ufz.de
Antonis Chatzinotas
András Táncsics
Gwenaël Imfeld
Matthias Kästner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE) is an emerging tool for parallel detection of DNA sequences of different target microorganisms. The specificity and sensitivity of the SNuPE method were assessed by performing single and multiplex reactions using defined template mixtures of 16S rRNA gene PCR products obtained from pure bacterial cultures. The mismatch discrimination potential of primer extension was investigated by introducing different single and multiple primer-target mismatches. The type and position of the mismatch had significant effects on the specificity of the assay. While a 3'-terminal mismatch has a considerable effect on the fidelity of the extension reaction, the internal mismatches influenced hybridization mostly by destabilizing the hybrid duplex. Thus, carefully choosing primer-mismatch positions should result in a high signal-to-noise ratio and prevent any nonspecific extension. Cyclic fluorescent labeling of the hybridized primers via extension also resulted in a significant increase in the detection sensitivity of the PCR. In multiplex reactions, the signal ratios detected after specific primer extension correlated with the original template ratios. In addition, reverse-transcribed 16S rRNA was successfully used as a nonamplified template to prove the applicability of SNuPE in a PCR-independent manner. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the great potential of SNuPE for simultaneous detection and typing of various nucleic acid sequences from both environmental and engineered samples.

Indexed as

BacteriaBase SequenceDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalMolecular BiologyMolecular Sequence DataRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificityDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID19251891
PMCPMC2681687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.