Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19250986›Full record

SynthesisClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2009

Role of fluoroquinolones in the primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: meta-analysis.

Rohit Loomba, Robert Wesley, Andrew Bain, Gyorgy Csako, Frank Pucino

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Recent developments in the management of ascites in cirrhosis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Novel perspectives in the management of decompensated cirrhosis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: recommendations from two United States centers.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rohit LoombaDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: roloomba@ucsd.edu.
Robert WesleyHospital Epidemiology, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland.
Andrew BainDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Gyorgy CsakoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland.
Frank PucinoPharmacy Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

The UCSD Digestive Diseases Research Development CenterR24DK080506 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ECKMANN, LARS · 2008 to 2012
$2.7M
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASEK23DK090303 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LOOMBA, ROHIT · 2011 to 2014
$721k
Intramural NIH HHSNIDDK NIH HHS DK080506NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK090303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe use of antibiotics in the primary prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in patients with cirrhosis is controversial. Our purpose was to determine the beneficial effect of fluoroquinolones as compared with placebo in primary prophylaxis of SBP in high-risk patients with cirrhosis by using meta-analysis.

methodsMedline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched in all languages until August 2008 for randomized placebo-controlled studies evaluating the role of fluoroquinolones in primary prevention of SBP in patients with low protein ascites (total ascitic protein, <1.5 g/dL) and without history of SBP. Two investigators independently performed literature search and data extraction, and then another investigator independently reviewed whether the studies met prespecified criteria and rechecked data extraction. Odds ratios (Peto method) for the risk reduction with fluoroquinolones were calculated for each study and combined by using a random-effects model.

resultsFour randomized controlled studies met predefined criteria. The odds ratios for developing first episode of SBP, serious infections, and mortality with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis (n = 194) versus placebo (n = 190) were 0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.35), 0.18 (95% CI, 0.10-0.32), and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.37-0.97), respectively. All studies were unidirectional in showing the beneficial effect of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis. We were limited by finding few studies with relatively small sample sizes.

conclusionsDaily oral fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduces the risk of development of first episode of SBP and mortality in cirrhotic patients with low total protein in the ascitic fluid. Fluoroquinolones might be advisable for the primary prophylaxis of SBP in selected high-risk patients with cirrhosis.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisBacterial InfectionsClinical Trials as TopicFluoroquinolonesHumansLiver CirrhosisModels, StatisticalPeritonitisTreatment OutcomeFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID19250986
PMCPMC5807076
OpenAlexW2059057419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.