Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19250772›Full record

ArticleCancer detection and prevention2009

A deficit in biopsying potentially premalignant oral lesions in Puerto Rico.

Douglas E Morse, Walter J Psoter, Lumarie Cuadrado, Yves A Jean, Joan Phelan, Khush Mittal, Carmen J Buxó, Gustavo D Cruz, Augusto Elias

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer detection and prevention, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Increasing opportunistic oral cancer screening examinations: findings from focus groups with general dentists in Puerto Rico.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Douglas E MorseNew York University College of Dentistry, Department of Epidemiology & Health Promotion, New York, NY 10003-1402, USA. dem5@nyu.edu
Walter J Psoter
Lumarie Cuadrado
Yves A Jean
Joan Phelan
Khush Mittal
Carmen J Buxó
Gustavo D Cruz
Augusto Elias
University of Puerto Rico System · PRNew York University · USUniversity School · USYork University · US

Funding

RISK OF ORAL EPITHELIAL DYSPLASIA IN PUERTO RICOU54DE014257 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MORSE, DOUGLAS E · 2001 to 2007
$7.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE014257NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE14257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoral lesions clinically suspicious for cancer/precancer should be biopsied and diagnosed histopathologically. We evaluated whether the frequency of oral cancer (OC) cases diagnosed in Puerto Rico (PR) is disproportionately high relative to the frequency of persons with histopathologic diagnoses that would have appeared clinically suspicious for OC/precancer at biopsy.

methodsAll pathology reports for oral (ICD-O-3 C01-C06) soft tissue biopsies generated during 1/2004-5/2005 by seven PR and two New York City (NYC) pathology laboratories were reviewed. The analysis was restricted to persons diagnosed with invasive oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), epithelial dysplasia, or hyperkeratosis/epithelial hyperplasia (HK/EH), i.e., diagnoses associated with lesions clinically suspicious for OC/precancer. The OC relative frequency measured the percentage of persons diagnosed with OSCC among persons with OSCC, dysplasia, or HK/EH. OC relative frequencies for PR and NYC laboratories were compared.

resultsOverall, the OC relative frequency was 67% in PR and 40% and 4% in the NYC general and oral pathology laboratories, respectively (each p<0.001). In PR, the OC relative frequency was highest for males (80%). When OC relative frequencies were stratified by pathology laboratory type (general/oral) and compared across PR and NYC, age/gender-specific OC relative frequencies were always higher in PR; however, differences were consistently statistically significant for males only.

conclusionA disparity in the OC relative frequency exists in PR vs. NYC indicating a shortfall in biopsying potentially precancerous oral lesions in PR. PR residents with intraoral lesions suspicious for oral cancer/precancer are most likely to be biopsied only after developing an invasive OC.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBiopsyCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Transformation, NeoplasticEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansLaboratoriesMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsNew York CityPrecancerous ConditionsPuerto RicoSex FactorsSoft Tissue Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19250772
PMCPMC2705785
OpenAlexW2027542276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.