Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19250154›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2009

Lay perceptions of the desired role and type of user involvement in clinical governance.

Andrea Litva, Krysia Canvin, Michael Shepherd, Ann Jacoby, Mark Gabbay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Group affiliation in self-management: support or threat to identity?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Aiming for inclusion: a case study of motivations for involvement in mental health-care governance by ethnic minority users.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  8. Citizens' participation in the Italian health-care system: the experience of the Mixed Advisory Committees.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014
    Article
  9. Same description, different values. How service users and providers define patient and public involvement in health care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013
    Article
  10. The role of community representatives on health service committees: staff expectations vs. reality.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2011
    Article
  11. Are elected health boards an effective mechanism for public participation in health service governance?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2010
    Article
  12. Public involvement in health service governance and development: questions of potential for influence.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea LitvaSchool of Population, Community and Behavioural Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. litva@liverpool.ac.uk
Krysia Canvin
Michael Shepherd
Ann Jacoby
Mark Gabbay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this paper is to explore variations in lay perceptions of user involvement in clinical governance. CONTEXT: The English National Health Service has sought to build a dependable health service through enhanced effectiveness, responsiveness and consistency. Clinical governance, a policy for improving service quality, is a key pillar of these reforms. It is a statutory duty of primary care organizations to ensure that users are involved in all service planning and decision making, including clinical governance. Yet surveys indicated that user involvement in clinical governance was underdeveloped and underutilized.

designFocus groups were conducted with different types of lay people to explore their perceptions around public involvement in different aspects of clinical governance policy.

resultsContent analysis of the transcripts reveals that different groups of lay people varied in their desired role perspective and preferred type of involvement in different aspects of clinical governance policy. Drawing upon existing models of user involvement, we identified three role perspectives that lay people could take in user involvement - consumer, advocate and citizen. We compared our findings regarding the desired type of involvement with existing models of user involvement, and identified a new type of involvement, overseeing, that is relevant to clinical governance policy.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that to facilitate user involvement in clinical governance, it would be necessary to use different strategies to accommodate the differing role perspectives and types of involvement desired by different groups of lay people.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth Facility AdministrationPublic OpinionEnglandFocus GroupsHumansState MedicineWales

Identifiers

PMID19250154
PMCPMC5060476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.