Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19247714›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2009

Stem/progenitor cells derived from the cochlear sensory epithelium give rise to spheres with distinct morphologies and features.

Marc Diensthuber, Kazuo Oshima, Stefan Heller

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Analysis of miRNAs from Inner Ear Organoid-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A NovelFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Progenitor Cells from the Adult Human Inner Ear.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transplantation and survival of mouse inner ear progenitor/stem cells in the organ of Corti after cochleostomy of hearing-impaired guinea pigs: preliminary results.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc DiensthuberDepartments of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery and Molecular & Cellular Physiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 801 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305-5739, USA.
Kazuo Oshima
Stefan Heller
Stanford University · US

Funding

INNER EAR PROGENITOR CELLSR01DC006167 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HELLER, STEFAN · 2003 to 2013
$4.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC006167NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonmammalian vertebrates regenerate lost sensory hair cells by means of asymmetric division of supporting cells. Inner ear or lateral line supporting cells in birds, amphibians, and fish consequently serve as bona fide stem cells resulting in high regenerative capacity of hair cell-bearing organs. Hair cell regeneration does not happen in the mammalian cochlea, but cells with proliferative capacity can be isolated from the neonatal cochlea. These cells have the ability to form clonal floating colonies, so-called spheres, when cultured in nonadherent conditions. We noticed that the sphere population derived from mouse cochlear sensory epithelium cells was heterogeneous, consisting of morphologically distinct sphere types, hereby classified as solid, transitional, and hollow. Cochlear sensory epithelium-derived stem/progenitor cells initially give rise to small solid spheres, which subsequently transition into hollow spheres, a change that is accompanied by epithelial differentiation of the majority of sphere cells. Only solid spheres, and to a lesser extent, transitional spheres, appeared to harbor self-renewing stem cells, whereas hollow spheres could not be consistently propagated. Solid spheres contained significantly more rapidly cycling Pax-2-expressing presumptive otic progenitor cells than hollow spheres. Islet-1, which becomes upregulated in nascent sensory patches, was also more abundant in solid than in hollow spheres. Likewise, hair cell-like cells, characterized by the expression of multiple hair cell markers, differentiated in significantly higher numbers in cell populations derived from solid spheres. We conclude that cochlear sensory epithelium cell populations initially give rise to small solid spheres that have self-renewing capacity before they subsequently convert into hollow spheres, a process that is accompanied by loss of stemness and reduced ability to spontaneously give rise to hair cell-like cells. Solid spheres might, therefore, represent the most suitable sphere type for cell-based assays or animal model transplantation studies aimed at development of cell replacement therapies.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsCadherinsCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationCochleaEpitheliumHomeodomain ProteinsImmunohistochemistryLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPAX2 Transcription FactorStem CellsTime FactorsCadherinsHomeodomain Proteinsinsulin gene enhancer binding protein Isl-1LIM-Homeodomain ProteinsPax2 protein, mousePAX2 Transcription FactorTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19247714
PMCPMC2674204
OpenAlexW1971062366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.