Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19247629›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2009

Investigation of DNA polymorphisms in SMAD genes for genetic predisposition to diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

A J McKnight, A M Woodman, M Parkkonen, C C Patterson, D A Savage, C Forsblom, K A Pettigrew, D Sadlier, P H Groop, A P Maxwell and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A GREM1 gene variant associates with diabetic nephropathy.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A J McKnightNephrology Research Group, Queen's University of Belfast, c/o Regional Genetics Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK. a.j.mcknight@qub.ac.uk
A M Woodman
M Parkkonen
C C Patterson
D A Savage
C Forsblom
K A Pettigrew
D Sadlier
P H Groop
A P Maxwell
Warren 3/UK GoKinD Study Group
University of Ulster · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisSMAD proteins are involved in multiple signalling pathways and are key modulators of gene expression. We hypothesised that genetic variation in selected SMAD genes contributes to susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy.

methodsWe selected 13 haplotype tag (ht) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 67 variants identified by resequencing the SMAD2 and SMAD3 genes. For SMAD1, SMAD4 and SMAD5 genes, genotype data were downloaded for 217 SNPs from Phase II of the International HapMap project. Of these, 85 SNPs met our inclusion criteria, resulting in the selection of 13 tag SNPs for further investigation. A case-control approach was employed, using 267 nephropathic patients and 442 controls with type 1 diabetes from Ireland. Two further populations (totalling 1,407 patients, 2,238 controls) were genotyped to validate initial findings. Genotyping was conducted using iPLEX, TaqMan and gel electrophoresis.

resultsThe distribution of genotypes was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Analysis by the chi(2) test of genotype and allele frequencies in patients versus controls in the Irish population (n = 709) revealed evidence for the association of one allele at 5% level of significance (rs10515478, p(uncorrected) = 0.006; p(corrected) = 0.04). This finding represents a relatively small difference in allele frequency of 6.4% in the patient group compared with 10.7% in the control group; this difference was not supported in subsequent investigations using DNA from European individuals with similar phenotypic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationWe selected an appropriate subset of variants for the investigation of common genetic risk factors and assessed SMAD1 to SMAD5 genes for association with diabetic nephropathy. We conclude that common polymorphisms in these genes do not strongly influence genetic susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in white individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdolescentBlood PressureDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic NephropathiesGenotypeGlycated HemoglobinHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMiddle AgedSmad1 ProteinSmad4 ProteinSmad5 ProteinSmad ProteinsGlycated HemoglobinSmad1 ProteinSMAD1 protein, humanSmad4 ProteinSMAD4 protein, humanSmad5 ProteinSMAD5 protein, humanSmad Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19247629
OpenAlexW2050593481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.