Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19243617›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009

An improved ontological representation of dendritic cells as a paradigm for all cell types.

Anna Maria Masci, Cecilia N Arighi, Alexander D Diehl, Anne E Lieberman, Chris Mungall, Richard H Scheuermann, Barry Smith, Lindsay G Cowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of an Ontology for Periodontitis.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna Maria MasciDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. annamaria.masci@duke.edu
Cecilia N Arighi
Alexander D Diehl
Anne E Lieberman
Chris Mungall
Richard H Scheuermann
Barry Smith
Lindsay G Cowell

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
Resource ProjectU41HG002273 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMAS, PAUL D. · 2012 to 2021
$34.7M
Gene Ontology ConsortiumP41HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
PRO: A Protein Ontology in Open Biomedical OntologiesR01GM080646 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI WU, CATHY H. · 2007 to 2018
$8.9M
Host Susceptibility to S. aureusR01AI068804 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOWLER, VANCE G. · 2007 to 2016
$6.9M
GENE ONTOLOGY CONSORTIUMR01HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2001 to 2003
$5.8M
Immune System Biological Networks:Case Study Improved Data Integration & AnalysisR01AI077706 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI COWELL, LINDSAY G. · 2008 to 2011
$1.7M
IRAK Family Function in Bacterial InfectionR01AI050019 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI THOMAS, JAMES ALANSON · 2002 to 2006
$1.4M
IRAK Family Function in Bacterial InfectionR21AI050019 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI THOMAS, JAMES ALANSON · 2001 to 2001
$267k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1 U 54 HG004028NHGRI NIH HHS HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS HG004028-01NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028NIAID NIH HHS AI50019NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040076NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI050019NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI40076).NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068804NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077706NIGMS NIH HHS 1 R01 GM080646-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080646Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent increases in the volume and diversity of life science data and information and an increasing emphasis on data sharing and interoperability have resulted in the creation of a large number of biological ontologies, including the Cell Ontology (CL), designed to provide a standardized representation of cell types for data annotation. Ontologies have been shown to have significant benefits for computational analyses of large data sets and for automated reasoning applications, leading to organized attempts to improve the structure and formal rigor of ontologies to better support computation. Currently, the CL employs multiple is_a relations, defining cell types in terms of histological, functional, and lineage properties, and the majority of definitions are written with sufficient generality to hold across multiple species. This approach limits the CL's utility for computation and for cross-species data integration.

resultsTo enhance the CL's utility for computational analyses, we developed a method for the ontological representation of cells and applied this method to develop a dendritic cell ontology (DC-CL). DC-CL subtypes are delineated on the basis of surface protein expression, systematically including both species-general and species-specific types and optimizing DC-CL for the analysis of flow cytometry data. We avoid multiple uses of is_a by linking DC-CL terms to terms in other ontologies via additional, formally defined relations such as has_function.

conclusionThis approach brings benefits in the form of increased accuracy, support for reasoning, and interoperability with other ontology resources. Accordingly, we propose our method as a general strategy for the ontological representation of cells. DC-CL is available from http://www.obofoundry.org.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, FactualDendritic CellsInformation Storage and RetrievalTerminology as TopicVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID19243617
PMCPMC2662812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.