Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19243091›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2009

Phosphatidylcholine "wobble" in vesicles assessed by high-resolution 13C field cycling NMR spectroscopy.

V N Sivanandam, Jingfei Cai, Alfred G Redfield, Mary F Roberts

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An NMR database for simulations of membrane dynamics.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2011
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V N SivanandamDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Institute, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA.
Jingfei Cai
Alfred G Redfield
Mary F Roberts
Brandeis University · US

Funding

Applications of Field-Cycling NMR to Studies of Biomolecules.R01GM077974 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI REDFIELD, ALFRED GUILLOU · 2005 to 2008
$596k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM077974NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High resolution (13)C NMR field cycling (covering 11.7 down to 0.002 T) relaxation studies of the sn-2 carbonyl of phosphatidylcholines in vesicles provide a detailed look at the dynamics of this position of the phospholipid in vesicles. The spin-lattice relaxation rate, R(1), observed down to 0.05 T is the result of dipolar and CSA relaxation components characterized by a single correlation time tau(c), with a small contribution from a faster motion contributing to CSA relaxation. At lower fields, R(1) increases further with a correlation time consistent with vesicle tumbling. The tau(c) is particularly interesting since it is 2-3 times slower than what is observed for (31)P of the same phospholipid. However, cholesterol increases the tau(c) for both (31)P and (13)C sites to the same value, approximately 25 ns. These observations suggest faster local motion dominates the dipolar relaxation of the (31)P, while a slower rotation or wobble dominates the relaxation of the carbonyl carbon by the alpha-CH(2) group. The faster motion must be damped with the sterol present. As a general methodology, high resolution (13)C field cycling may be useful for quantifying dynamics in other complex systems as long as a (13)C label (without attached protons) can be introduced.

Indexed as

Lipid BilayersMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPhosphatidylcholinesThermodynamicsLipid BilayersPhosphatidylcholines

Identifiers

PMID19243091
PMCPMC2753464
OpenAlexW2004262062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.