Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19243052›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2009

Noninvasive monitoring of a murine model of metastatic pheochromocytoma: a comparison of contrast-enhanced microCT and nonenhanced MRI.

Lucia Martiniova, Melanie S Kotys, David Thomasson, Daniel Schimel, Edwin W Lai, Marcelino Bernardo, Maria J Merino, James F Powers, Jan Ruzicka, Richard Kvetnansky and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Between Prometheus and Thanatos: Reflections on Intracardiac Injection Models for Metastasis in Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Highly metastatic K7M2 cell line: A novel murine model capable of in vivo imaging via luciferase vector transfection.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucia MartiniovaReproductive and Adult Endocrinology Program, National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1109, USA.
Melanie S Kotys
David Thomasson
Daniel Schimel
Edwin W Lai
Marcelino Bernardo
Maria J Merino
James F Powers
Jan Ruzicka
Richard Kvetnansky
Peter L Choyke
Karel Pacak
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USNational Cancer Institute · USSlovak Academy of Sciences · SKCardinal Glennon Children’s Medical Center · USComenius University Bratislava · SKNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USScience Applications International Corporation (United States) · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

Diagnosis, Pathophysiology And Molecular Biology of Pheochromocytoma and ParagangliomaZIAHD008735 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI PACAK, KAREL · 2009 to 2024
$28.4M
Instrumentation for microSPECT and microPET imagingZIABC010668 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$11.0M
Study of Hereditary Renal and Other Familial SyndromesZIABC010696 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MERINO, MARIA · 2009 to 2025
$4.5M
PHEOCHROMOCYTOMAS FROM NEUROFIBROMATOSIS KNOCKOUT MICER01NS037685 · NINDS · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI TISCHLER, ARTHUR S · 1999 to 2003
$1.1M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS N01 CO012400NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400NINDS NIH HHS NS37685NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS037685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography (microCT) and nonenhanced respiratory-triggered magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in an animal model of metastatic pheochromocytoma. Animal models are becoming important in the study of cancer treatment and imaging is useful in minimizing the number of animals needed and reducing costs associated with autopsies. However, the choice of imaging modality is still evolving. MATERIALS AND

methodsAdult female nude mice were injected by tail vein with a mouse pheochromocytoma (MPC) cell line (MPC 4/30PRR) to create a metastatic model. After optimizing imaging techniques, eight mice were imaged with both respiratory triggered MRI and microCT and the findings were verified histologically.

resultsMicroCT and MRI were approximately equal in their ability to detect hepatic metastases at a size threshold of 350 microm. In the lungs, MRI was more sensitive than microCT, detecting lesions 0.6 mm in diameter versus 1 mm for microCT. Additionally, MRI was more sensitive for lesions in the kidneys, bone, ovaries, and adrenal glands. MRI demonstrated a higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) than microCT.

conclusionIn addition to the advantage of not exposing the animal to ionizing radiation, MRI provided a more complete assessment of the extent of metastases in this model compared to microCT.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsAnimalsBone NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalKidney NeoplasmsLiver Neoplasms, ExperimentalLung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceMice, NudeMonitoring, PhysiologicContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID19243052
PMCPMC2750094
OpenAlexW2136941589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.