Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19242492›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2009

Blood pressure control and drug therapy in patients with diagnosed hypertension: a survey in Italian general practice.

A Filippi, I Paolini, F Innocenti, G Mazzaglia, A Battaggia, O Brignoli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Prescription of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: interrupted time series study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and Control of Hypertension in Different Macro-Areas in Italy: Analysis of a Large Database by the General Practice.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Lack of blood pressure control in Italy: room for improvement?High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2015
    Article
  11. Why is my hypertensive patient still not controlled?High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Billing code algorithms to identify cases of peripheral artery disease from administrative data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A FilippiItalian College of General Practitioners, Via del Pignoncino, Florence, Italy. filippi.alessandro@simg.it
I Paolini
F Innocenti
G Mazzaglia
A Battaggia
O Brignoli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) control remains unsatisfactory worldwide. Better knowledge of BP management in clinical practice is needed to develop more effective improving strategies. Using a large Italian primary care database, we selected the subjects diagnosed with hypertension, and extracted the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris/coronary disease, stroke/transitory ischemic attack (TIA), heart failure, atrial fibrillation, peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, the serum total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, creatinine, BP, electrocardiogram, weight, height and the prescription of cardiovascular (CV) drugs. Hypertension was recorded in 119.065 individuals (prevalence 19.3%), 19.134 (16%) had no ambulatory visit and 33.183 (27.8%) had no BP value recorded. Overall, 14.594 (21.9%) had at least one recorded diagnosis showing high CV risk. BP was controlled (mean of BP values <140/90 mm Hg) in 28.918 patients (16.690 women, 12 189 men and 40 gender not recorded), that is, 43.23% of the subjects with recorded BP. Among the non-controlled patients, 21.866 (57.8%) were non-high risk grade 1 (mean BP 142.5/84.5 mm Hg; s.d. 13.1/8.2) and 7.123 (18.8%) high-risk grade 1 hypertensives (mean BP 150/83 mm Hg; s.d. 6.2/7.2). Less than three drugs were prescribed in 29.919 (79.1%) of non-controlled patients. Low attendance rate, BP under-recording and suboptimal use of politherapy are major obstacles to hypertension control. Most uncontrolled individuals are low-CV risk, grade 1 hypertensive patients, for whom the personal benefit of adding another drug is modest. Aiming at the recommended BP target in uncontrolled grade 2-3 hypertensive/high-CV risk patients would probably require two additional drugs.

Indexed as

Family PracticePractice Patterns, Physicians'Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesDrug PrescriptionsDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug UtilizationFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHumansHypertensionItalyMalePractice Guidelines as TopicAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID19242492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.