Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19242486›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2009

State of the art in conventional mechanical ventilation.

M Keszler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01785563 (Nasal Noninvasive NAVA Provides Ventilation in the Very Low Birth Weight Infant), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01785563 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Nasal Noninvasive NAVA Provides Ventilation in the Very Low Birth Weight Infant

TypeinterventionalSponsorTarah T ColaizyRan2013 to 2018Enrolled40ConditionsInadequate, Pulmonary Ventilation, Newborn, Infant, Very Low Birth WeightArmsNasal NIV-NAVA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation for preterm infants.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Factors leading to rehospitalization for tracheostomized and ventilator-dependent infants through 2 years of age.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Prospective crossover comparison between NAVA and pressure control ventilation in premature neonates less than 1500 grams.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A practical guide to neonatal volume guarantee ventilation.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M KeszlerDepartment of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA. keszlerm@gunet.georgetown.edu
Georgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a shift to noninvasive respiratory support, mechanical ventilation remains an essential tool in the care of critically ill neonates. The availability of a variety of technologically advanced devices with a host of available modes and confusing terminology presents a daunting challenge to the practicing neonatologist. Many of the available modes have not been adequately evaluated in newborn infants and there is paucity of information on the relative merits of those modes that have been studied. This review examines the special challenges of ventilating the extremely low birth weight infants that now constitute an increasing proportion of ventilated infants, attempts to provide a simple functional classification of ventilator modes and addresses the key aspects of synchronized ventilation modes. The rationale for volume-targeted ventilation is presented, the available modes are described and the importance of the open-lung strategy is emphasized. The available literature on volume-targeted modalities is reviewed in detail and general recommendations for their clinical application are provided. Volume guarantee has been studied most extensively and shown to reduce excessively large tidal volumes, decrease incidence of inadvertent hyperventilation, reduce duration of mechanical ventilation and reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines. It remains to be seen whether the demonstrated short-term benefits translate into significant reduction in chronic lung disease. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation by means of early continuous positive airway pressure with or without surfactant administration may still be the most effective way to reduce the risk of lung injury. For babies who do require mechanical ventilation, the combination of volume-targeted ventilation, combined with the open-lung strategy appears to offer the best chance of reducing the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely Low Birth WeightBronchopulmonary DysplasiaCytokinesHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayPrognosisRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornRespiratory MechanicsTidal VolumeVentilators, MechanicalCytokines

Identifiers

PMID19242486
OpenAlexW2140510857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.