Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19242104›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics2009

Replication timing as an epigenetic mark.

Ichiro Hiratani, David M Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modulating DNA Polα Enhances Cell Reprogramming Across Species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The 3D Genome: From Structure to Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dosage compensation in Drosophila.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ichiro HirataniDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
David M Gilbert

Funding

Genome Plasticity during ES Cell Differentiation to Neural LineagesR01GM083337 · NIGMS · SAN DIEGO BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI David M Gilbert · 2007 to 2026
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM83337NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although early replication has long been associated with accessible chromatin, replication timing is not included in most discussions of epigenetic marks. This is partly due to a lack of understanding of the mechanisms behind this association but the issue has also been confounded by studies concluding that there are very few changes in replication timing during development. Recently, the first genome-wide study of replication timing during the course of differentiation revealed extensive changes that were strongly associated with changes in transcriptional activity and subnuclear organization. Domains of temporally coordinate replication delineate discrete units of chromosome structure and function that are characteristic of particular differentiation states. Hence, although we are still a long way from understanding the functional significance of replication timing, it is clear that replication timing is a distinct epigenetic signature of cell differentiation state.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticCell CycleCell DifferentiationDNA ReplicationTime FactorsTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID19242104
PMCPMC2688700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.