ArticleGenetic epidemiology2009
Identification of gene-gene interactions in the presence of missing data using the multifactor dimensionality reduction method.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review on GPU accelerated methods for genome-wide SNP-SNP interactions.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2024Review
- Gene-Gene Interaction Analysis for the Survival Phenotype Based on the Kaplan-Meier Median Estimate.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Review
- Bridging the gap between statistical and biological epistasis in Alzheimer's disease.BioMed research international · 2015Review
- Cuckoo search epistasis: a new method for exploring significant genetic interactions.Heredity · 2014Article
- A modified entropy-based approach for identifying gene-gene interactions in case-control study.PloS one · 2013Article
- Gene-gene interaction analysis for the survival phenotype based on the Cox model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Multiple pathway-based genetic variations associated with tobacco related multiple primary neoplasms.PloS one · 2012Article
- Analysis of gene-gene interactions.Current protocols in human genetics · 2011Article
- A dimension reduction approach for modeling multi-locus interaction in case-control studies.Human heredity · 2011Article
- Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Review
- Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics.American journal of human genetics · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene-gene interaction is believed to play an important role in understanding complex traits. Multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) was proposed by Ritchie et al. [2001. Am J Hum Genet 69:138-147] to identify multiple loci that simultaneously affect disease susceptibility. Although the MDR method has been widely used to detect gene-gene interactions, few studies have been reported on MDR analysis when there are missing data. Currently, there are four approaches available in MDR analysis to handle missing data. The first approach uses only complete observations that have no missing data, which can cause a severe loss of data. The second approach is to treat missing values as an additional genotype category, but interpretation of the results may then be not clear and the conclusions may be misleading. Furthermore, it performs poorly when the missing rates are unbalanced between the case and control groups. The third approach is a simple imputation method that imputes missing genotypes as the most frequent genotype, which may also produce biased results. The fourth approach, Available, uses all data available for the given loci to increase power. In any real data analysis, it is not clear which MDR approach one should use when there are missing data. In this article, we consider a new EM Impute approach to handle missing data more appropriately. Through simulation studies, we compared the performance of the proposed EM Impute approach with the current approaches. Our results showed that Available and EM Impute approaches perform better than the three other current approaches in terms of power and precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.