Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19241410›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2009

Identification of gene-gene interactions in the presence of missing data using the multifactor dimensionality reduction method.

Junghyun Namkung, Robert C Elston, Jun-Mo Yang, Taesung Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of gene-gene interactions.Current protocols in human genetics · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics.American journal of human genetics · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junghyun NamkungBioinformatics Program, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Robert C Elston
Jun-Mo Yang
Taesung Park

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIFACTORIAL TRAITSR37GM028356 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ELSTON, ROBERT C. · 1998 to 2007
$2.9M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIFACTORIAL TRAITSR01GM028356 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC NEW ORLEANS · PI ELSTON, ROBERT C. · 1985 to 1997
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM28356NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028356NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM028356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-gene interaction is believed to play an important role in understanding complex traits. Multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) was proposed by Ritchie et al. [2001. Am J Hum Genet 69:138-147] to identify multiple loci that simultaneously affect disease susceptibility. Although the MDR method has been widely used to detect gene-gene interactions, few studies have been reported on MDR analysis when there are missing data. Currently, there are four approaches available in MDR analysis to handle missing data. The first approach uses only complete observations that have no missing data, which can cause a severe loss of data. The second approach is to treat missing values as an additional genotype category, but interpretation of the results may then be not clear and the conclusions may be misleading. Furthermore, it performs poorly when the missing rates are unbalanced between the case and control groups. The third approach is a simple imputation method that imputes missing genotypes as the most frequent genotype, which may also produce biased results. The fourth approach, Available, uses all data available for the given loci to increase power. In any real data analysis, it is not clear which MDR approach one should use when there are missing data. In this article, we consider a new EM Impute approach to handle missing data more appropriately. Through simulation studies, we compared the performance of the proposed EM Impute approach with the current approaches. Our results showed that Available and EM Impute approaches perform better than the three other current approaches in terms of power and precision.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseModels, GeneticAlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationExonsGenotypeHumansIntronsModels, StatisticalMolecular EpidemiologyOdds RatioPattern Recognition, AutomatedPromoter Regions, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID19241410
PMCPMC2766017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.