Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19241144›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2009

Analysis of families with Lynch syndrome complicated by advanced serrated neoplasia: the importance of pathology review and pedigree analysis.

Michael D Walsh, Daniel D Buchanan, Rhiannon Walters, Aedan Roberts, Sven Arnold, Diane McKeone, Mark Clendenning, Andrew R Ruszkiewicz, Mark A Jenkins, John L Hopper and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael D WalshFamilial Cancer Laboratory, QIMR, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
Daniel D Buchanan
Rhiannon Walters
Aedan Roberts
Sven Arnold
Diane McKeone
Mark Clendenning
Andrew R Ruszkiewicz
Mark A Jenkins
John L Hopper
Jack Goldblatt
Jillian George
Graeme K Suthers
Kerry Phillips
Graeme P Young
Finlay Macrae
Musa Drini
Michael O Woods
Susan Parry
Jeremy R Jass
Joanne P Young
South Australia Pathology · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Queensland · AUFlinders University · AUMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAMiddlemore Hospital · NZServices Australia · AUSt Mark's Hospital · GBThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

AUSTRALASIAN COLORECTAL CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2002 to 2007
$6.9M
Genetics of Serrated NeoplasiaR01CA123010 · NCI · QUEENSLAND INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI YOUNG, JOANNE PATRICIA · 2007 to 2009
$898k
Redox Regulation of Metastasis by Sod2K22CA095011 · NCI · ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE · PI MELENDEZ, JUAN ANDRES · 2002 to 2004
$446k
NCI NIH HHS CA-95-011NCI NIH HHS R01 CA123010NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097735NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA097735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of Lynch syndrome has been greatly assisted by the advent of tumour immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, and by the recognition of the role of acquired somatic BRAF mutation in sporadic MMR-deficient colorectal cancer (CRC). However, somatic BRAF mutation may also be present in the tumours in families with a predisposition to develop serrated polyps in the colorectum. In a subgroup of affected members in these families, CRCs emerge which demonstrate clear evidence of MMR deficiency with absent MLH1 staining and high-level microsatellite instability (MSI). This may result in these families being erroneously classified as Lynch syndrome, or conversely, an individual is considered "sporadic" due to the presence of a somatic BRAF mutation in a tumour. In this report, we describe two Lynch syndrome families who demonstrated several such inconsistencies. In one family, IHC deficiency of both MSH2 and MLH1 was demonstrated in tumours from different affected family members, presenting a confusing diagnostic picture. In the second family, MLH1 loss was observed in the lesions of both MLH1 mutation carriers and those who showed normal MLH1 germline sequence. Both families had Lynch syndrome complicated by an independently segregating serrated neoplasia phenotype, suggesting that in families such as these, tumour and germline studies of several key members, rather than of a single proband, are indicated to clarify the spectrum of risk.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenomaAdultAgedColonic PolypsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsPedigreeAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBRAF protein, humanMLH1 protein, humanMSH2 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID19241144
PMCPMC2783449
OpenAlexW1974349056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.