ArticleJournal of neurology2009
Candidate gene analysis of selectin cluster in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Ser290Asn and Thr715Pro Polymorphisms of theBiomolecules · 2020Article
- Polymorphisms in SELE gene and risk of coal workers' pneumoconiosis in Chinese: a case-control study.PloS one · 2013Article
- The association of L-selectin polymorphisms with L-selectin serum levels and risk of ischemic stroke.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2011Article
- Advances in multiple sclerosis research in 2009.Journal of neurology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a potential impact on the function of selectins (rs6133, rs4987310 and rs5368 substitutions localized in the coding regions of P-sel, L-sel and E-sel, respectively) were analyzed in an Italian population of 165 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as compared with 149 controls and in a replication American population of Caucasian descent consisting of 122 patients and 50 controls. No significant differences in either allelic or genotypic frequency in all the SNPs tested were found in the Italian population. A tendency to an increased frequency of the rs6133 T allele was observed in the American population, but applying the Bonferroni correction the significance threshold was not reached. Haploview analysis demonstrated that rs4987310 and rs5368 markers are in strong LD (D' = 0.97) in both populations. Combining the two SNPs, we found no difference in haplotype distribution in patients compared with controls, either in Italian or in American population. Despite the fact that selectins play a role in the pathogenesis of MS and their encoding genes are located in regions associated with the disease, the selectin gene cluster studied likely does not influence the susceptibility to MS in Caucasians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.