ArticleTobacco control2009
Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry.
Article in Tobacco control, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tobacco industry data on illicit tobacco trade: a systematic review of existing assessments.Tobacco control · 2019Pooled it
- Nicotine pouch pharmacokinetics compared to smoked tobacco: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2025Review
- Why addressing conflicts of interest is essential to progress in reducing commercially driven health harms: Lessons from tobacco.Future healthcare journal · 2025Article
- PMI-funded foundation for a smoke-free world: application of criteria to assess funding models that include financial support from the tobacco industry.Tobacco control · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review on oral nicotine pouches: Available scientific evidence and future research needs.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2025Review
- Document analysis of the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World's scientific outputs and activities: a case study in contemporary tobacco industry agnogenesis.Tobacco control · 2024Article
- Activity of the Tobacco Industry in Research and Scientific Literature.Tobacco use insights · 2024Article
- Complex Interventions for a Complex System? Using Systems Thinking to Explore Ways to Address Unhealthy Commodity Industry Influence on Public Health Policy.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Influence of Disclosed and Undisclosed Funding Sources in Tobacco Harm Reduction Discourse: A Social Network Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Review
- Paying lip service to publication ethics: scientific publishing practices and the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World.Tobacco control · 2021Article
- The Science for Profit Model-How and why corporations influence science and the use of science in policy and practice.PloS one · 2021Article
- The Moderate Alcohol and Cardiovascular Health Trial (MACH15): Design and methods for a randomized trial of moderate alcohol consumption and cardiometabolic risk.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2020Article
- Attitudes and practices of public health academics towards research funding from for-profit organizations: cross-sectional survey.International journal of public health · 2020Article
- Article
- JUUL Labs' sponsorship and the scientific integrity of vaping research.Lancet (London, England) · 2019Article
- Transformation of the Tobacco Industry.American journal of public health · 2019Article
- Lee et al. Respond.American journal of public health · 2019Article
- Safety of Safety Evaluation of Pesticides: developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2018Article
- Enhancing credibility of chemical safety studies: emerging consensus on key assessment criteria.Environmental health perspectives · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.