Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19240123›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2009

A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces.

Nurcan Tuncbag, Gozde Kar, Ozlem Keskin, Attila Gursoy, Ruth Nussinov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current Challenges and Opportunities in Designing Protein-Protein Interaction Targeted Drugs.Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nurcan TuncbagComputational Sciences and Engineering Program at Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gozde Kar
Ozlem Keskin
Attila Gursoy
Ruth Nussinov

Funding

Biomolecular Recognition and Binding MechanismsZIABC010441 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NUSSINOV, RUTH · 2009 to 2025
$9.4M
Method Development: Efficient Computer Vision Based AlgorithmsZIABC010442 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NUSSINOV, RUTH · 2009 to 2025
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unanimous agreement that cellular processes are (largely) governed by interactions between proteins has led to enormous community efforts culminating in overwhelming information relating to these proteins; to the regulation of their interactions, to the way in which they interact and to the function which is determined by these interactions. These data have been organized in databases and servers. However, to make these really useful, it is essential not only to be aware of these, but in particular to have a working knowledge of which tools to use for a given problem; what are the tool advantages and drawbacks; and no less important how to combine these for a particular goal since usually it is not one tool, but some combination of tool-modules that is needed. This is the goal of this review.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinInternetProtein Interaction MappingAnimalsBinding SitesHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Signal TransductionTumor Suppressor Protein p53ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID19240123
PMCPMC2671387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.