Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19239887›Full record

ReviewCell2009

Small RNAs as guardians of the genome.

Colin D Malone, Gregory J Hannon

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 469 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
469citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
112.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

469 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 854 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The pachytene-specific lncRNANon-coding RNA research · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The structural basis for RNA slicing by human Argonaute2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

409 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin D MaloneWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
Gregory J Hannon
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

VIRAL TRANSACTIVATIONP01CA013106 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI William Richard McCombie · 1985 to 2026
$116.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P01 CA013106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposons populate the landscape of all eukaryotic genomes. Often considered purely genomic parasites, transposons can also benefit their hosts, playing roles in gene regulation and in genome organization and evolution. Peaceful coexistence with mobile elements depends upon adaptive control mechanisms, since unchecked transposon activity can impact long-term fitness and acutely reduce the fertility of progeny. Here, we review the conserved roles played by small RNAs in the adaptation of eukaryotes to coexist with their genomic colonists. An understanding of transposon-defense pathways has uncovered recurring themes in the mechanisms by which genomes distinguish "self" from "non-self" and selectively silence the latter.

Indexed as

GenomeGenome, HumanAnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalRNA, UntranslatedRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID19239887
PMCPMC2792755
OpenAlexW2068847708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.