ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2009
Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of care for acute ischemic stroke in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study using a National database.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Challenges in osteoporosis treatment initiation in geriatric patients admitted under the hip-fracture pathway.Archives of osteoporosis · 2022Article
- Factors analysis on the use of key quality indicators for narrowing the gap of quality of care of breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Bone Health ECHO: telementoring to improve osteoporosis care.Women's health (London, England) · 2016Article
- Assessing the Quality of Osteoporosis Care in Practice.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- Use of osteoporosis medications after hospitalization for hip fracture: a cross-national study.The American journal of medicine · 2015Article
- Insights from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2014Observational
- Treatment of osteoporosis in men.Bone · 2013Review
- Gender differences for initiating teriparatide therapy: baseline data from the Direct Assessment of Nonvertebral Fracture in the Community Experience (DANCE) study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012Article
- Osteoporosis among Fallers without Concomitant Fracture Identified in an Emergency Department: Frequencies and Risk Factors.Advances in orthopedics · 2011Article
- The delivery of evidence-based preventive care for older Americans with arthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A significant gap exists between evidence-based advances and real-world clinical practice in the diagnosis and prevention of osteoporosis. The goal of osteoporosis care is to prevent fractures and improve health-related quality of life, and ideally lower mortality. Despite recent advances in osteoporosis detection and treatment options, studies suggest underdiagnosis and undertreatment of osteoporosis, even among those who have already sustained fractures. The challenges in translating knowledge into practice are multifaceted, with efforts directed at the patient, provider, and health care system levels achieving variable success at the population level. Methods to improve quality of care in osteoporosis need to be multipronged, with emphasis on clinical process improvement and reliance on interdisciplinary teams. We review the growing literature on quality of care for osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.