ArticleBMC systems biology2009
A framework for evolutionary systems biology.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of STAT2 resistance to flavivirus NS5 occurred multiple times despite genetic constraints.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Gene coexpression networks reveal molecular interactions underlying cichlid jaw modularity.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Investigating the Evolution and Development of Biological Systems from the Perspective of Thermo-Kinetics and Systems Theory.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2020Review
- Using Nutritional Geometry to Explore How Social Insects Navigate Nutritional Landscapes.Insects · 2020Review
- Kinetic Modeling of Virus Growth in Cells.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2018Review
- From Colitis to Cancer: An Evolutionary Trajectory That Merges Maths and Biology.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Molecular Population Genetics.Genetics · 2017Review
- Selection on Network Dynamics Drives Differential Rates of Protein Domain Evolution.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- A Philosophical Perspective on Evolutionary Systems Biology.Biological theory · 2015Article
- Lazy Updating of hubs can enable more realistic models by speeding up stochastic simulations.The Journal of chemical physics · 2014Article
- An attempt to construct a (general) mathematical framework to model biological "context-dependence".Systems and synthetic biology · 2013Article
- Boosting forward-time population genetic simulators through genotype compression.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Predicting complex traits using a diffusion kernel on genetic markers with an application to dairy cattle and wheat data.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2013Article
- Replaying the tape of life: quantification of the predictability of evolution.Frontiers in genetics · 2012Article
- EvoluCode: Evolutionary Barcodes as a Unifying Framework for Multilevel Evolutionary Data.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2012Article
- Trade-offs and constraints in allosteric sensing.PLoS computational biology · 2011Article
- Systems-biology approaches for predicting genomic evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2011Review
- Comparative BAC-based mapping in the white-throated sparrow, a novel behavioral genomics model, using interspecies overgo hybridization.BMC research notes · 2011Article
- Constraints and plasticity in genome and molecular-phenome evolution.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany difficult problems in evolutionary genomics are related to mutations that have weak effects on fitness, as the consequences of mutations with large effects are often simple to predict. Current systems biology has accumulated much data on mutations with large effects and can predict the properties of knockout mutants in some systems. However experimental methods are too insensitive to observe small effects.
resultsHere I propose a novel framework that brings together evolutionary theory and current systems biology approaches in order to quantify small effects of mutations and their epistatic interactions in silico. Central to this approach is the definition of fitness correlates that can be computed in some current systems biology models employing the rigorous algorithms that are at the core of much work in computational systems biology. The framework exploits synergies between the realism of such models and the need to understand real systems in evolutionary theory. This framework can address many longstanding topics in evolutionary biology by defining various 'levels' of the adaptive landscape. Addressed topics include the distribution of mutational effects on fitness, as well as the nature of advantageous mutations, epistasis and robustness. Combining corresponding parameter estimates with population genetics models raises the possibility of testing evolutionary hypotheses at a new level of realism.
conclusionEvoSysBio is expected to lead to a more detailed understanding of the fundamental principles of life by combining knowledge about well-known biological systems from several disciplines. This will benefit both evolutionary theory and current systems biology. Understanding robustness by analysing distributions of mutational effects and epistasis is pivotal for drug design, cancer research, responsible genetic engineering in synthetic biology and many other practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.