ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2009
Immunomodulation in the treatment of haematological malignancies.
Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antitransgene rejection responses contribute to attenuated persistence of adoptively transferred CD20/CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor redirected T cells in humans.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2010Trial
- TGF-β in hematologic malignancies: molecular functions and clinical applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint targeting antibodies hold promise for combinatorial cancer therapeutics.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- Lymphocyte subpopulation and dendritic cell phenotyping during antineoplastic therapy in human solid tumors.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2011Review
- Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: individualized stem cell and immune therapy of cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the continuous advances in immunology and cancer biology, haematological malignancies are often incurable. Conventional chemotherapy and radiation are efficacious for some lymphoma and leukaemia, however relapse and progressive disease often occurs. The evidence that the immune system can play an essential role in controlling cancer progression provide a basis for the development of active therapies, such as immunization, aimed to evoke or amplify a tumour-specific immune response. However, the inability of the patient's own immune system to mount effective responses against tumour antigens is a major limit of vaccination approaches. The adoptive transfer of effectors of the adaptive immune system is an attractive strategy to circumvent the limitations of autologous immune responses. Donor lymphocyte infusion and the transfer of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) have been the first forms of adoptive therapy approved for clinical use and are still fundamental components of immunotherapy of haematological malignancies. Due to the continuous characterization of tumour-specific antigen, the development of tumour-tailored therapies that exploit the specificity of antibodies and T cell receptors (TCRs) is progressing rapidly. This review highlights the current advances in the field of adoptive immunotherapy of haematological malignancies, starting by elucidating the ongoing progress in passive transfer of MoAbs. We will also discuss recent advances in the adoptive transfer with tumour-specific high avidity T cells, which can be generated ex vivo by the transfer of gene constructs encoding single chain antibodies or TCRs, thus redirecting T cell specificity to selected tumour antigens. The ability to produce gene-modified T cells of desired specificity and defined functional activity may improve in the future T cell based immunotherapy of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.