Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19238438›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2009

Clinical practice: treatment of childhood empyema.

Marijke Proesmans, Kris De Boeck

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Paediatric interventional radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marijke ProesmansDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. marijke.proesmans@uz.kuleuven.be
Kris De Boeck
KU Leuven · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe incidence of empyema in children is increasing. Adequate knowledge of treatment modalities is therefore essential for every pediatrician. At the university hospital of Leuven, the incidence per 100,000 admissions increased from 40 in 1993 to 120 in 2005. The treatment of choice, however, is still a matter of debate. This is mainly due to the scarcity of prospective randomized trials in children but is further complicated by the absence of uniform terminology. This review starts with clarifying definitions of empyema and complicated versus noncomplicated parapneumonic effusion. The place of different imaging techniques--ultrasound, chest X-ray, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging--is illustrated. All treatment steps are evaluated starting with antibiotic choices, duration of i.v. and oral antibiotics, pleural fluid analysis, indications for chest drain placement, and fibrinolysis. As to the surgical interventions, there is at present insufficient evidence that early surgery is superior to noninvasive medical treatment. Therefore, video-assisted thoracoscopy cannot be advised as general first-line therapy.

conclusionSince the pathogenicity of empyema is a dynamic process, therapeutic strategy must be decided based on empyema stage and clinical experience. Each referral center should agree on a diagnostic and therapeutic flowchart based on current evidence and local expertise. The flow chart outlined for our center is presented.

Indexed as

ChildEmpyema, PleuralHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPleural EffusionThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID19238438
OpenAlexW2105058485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.