ArticleThe Journal of physiology2009
A cytosolic factor that inhibits KATP channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes by impairing Mg-nucleotide activation by SUR1.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrasting effects of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate on cloned TMEM16A and TMEM16B channels.British journal of pharmacology · 2017Article
- KATP Channels in the Cardiovascular System.Physiological reviews · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channels couple cell metabolism to cell electrical activity. Wild-type (Kir6.2/SUR1) K(ATP) channels heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes give rise to very small inward currents in cell-attached patches. A large increase in the current is observed on patch excision into zero ATP solution. This is presumably due to loss of intracellular ATP leading to unblock of K(ATP) channels. In contrast, channels containing Kir6.2 mutations associated with reduced ATP-sensitivity display non-zero cell-attached currents. Unexpectedly, these cell-attached currents are significantly smaller (by approximately 40%) than those observed when excised patches are exposed to physiological ATP concentrations (1-10 mm). Cramming the patch back into the oocyte cytoplasm restores mutant K(ATP) current amplitude to that measured in the cell-attached mode. This implies that the magnitude of the cell-attached current is regulated not only by intracellular ATP but also by another cytoplasmic factor/s. This factor seems to require the nucleotide-binding domains of SUR1 to be effective. Thus a mutant Kir6.2 (Kir6.2DeltaC-I296L) expressed in the absence of SUR1 exhibited currents of similar magnitude in cell-attached patches as in inside-out patches exposed to 10 mm MgATP. Similar results were found when Kir6.2-I296L was coexpressed with an SUR1 mutant that is insensitive to MgADP or MgATP activation. This suggests the oocyte contains a cytoplasmic factor that reduces nucleotide binding/hydrolysis at the NBDs of SUR1. In conclusion, our results reveal a novel regulatory mechanism for the K(ATP) channel. This was not evident for wild-type channels because of their high sensitivity to block by ATP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.