Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19237108›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2009

Smoking patterns in Oregon youth: effects of funding and defunding of a comprehensive state tobacco control program.

Barbara A Pizacani, Clyde W Dent, Julie E Maher, Kristen Rohde, Michael J Stark, Anthony Biglan, Jill Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Did youth smoking behaviors change before and after the shutdown of Minnesota Youth Tobacco Prevention Initiative?Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2009
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara A PizacaniProgram Design and Evaluation Services, Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Public Health Division, Portland, Oregon 97232, USA. barbara.a.pizacani@state.or.us
Clyde W Dent
Julie E Maher
Kristen Rohde
Michael J Stark
Anthony Biglan
Jill Thompson

Funding

TOBACCO CONTROL ACTIVITIES AND ADOLESCENT TOBACCO USER01CA086169 · NCI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIGLAN, ANTHONY · 2000 to 2009
$12.1M
MOBILIZING PARENTS AND PEERS TO PREVENT TOBACCO USER01CA038273 · NCI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIGLAN, ANTHONY · 1985 to 2004
$5.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA38273NCI NIH HHS R01 CA038273NCI NIH HHS R01 CA086169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComprehensive tobacco control programs have included school-based prevention programs as a key strategy to reach adolescents. Unfortunately, these programs have undergone extensive budget reductions in recent years. In 2003, funding for the Oregon Tobacco Prevention and Education Program was reduced by about 70%, and the school component was entirely defunded. To assess the effects of program funding and subsequent defunding on smoking prevalence within targeted Oregon schools, we compared the change in 30-day smoking prevalence between grades 8 and 11 in school districts in two periods: namely, during funding and after funding was eliminated.

methodsWe used annual school-based survey data for grades 8 and 11 to describe district-level changes in smoking prevalence in five age cohorts: two during the funding period and three after defunding. Each cohort was comprised of districts whose 8th-graders completed the survey and participated again 3 years later. Using mixed models, we compared the change in 30-day adjusted smoking prevalence among cohorts in funded districts, defunded districts, and districts that never received funding.

resultsSmoking prevalence growth was significantly higher among cohorts from the defunded period than for cohorts from the funded period (p=.04) and was not significantly different from schools that were never-funded (p=.79).

conclusionsIn Oregon, funding a school component of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy was associated with depressed uptake of smoking. Gains were quickly lost upon program defunding. School programs are an important strategy if they are long term, comprehensive, and reinforced in the larger environment.

Indexed as

Financing, GovernmentState GovernmentAdolescentCohort StudiesHealth PromotionHealth SurveysHumansOregonSmokingSmoking Prevention

Identifiers

PMID19237108
PMCPMC4186742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.