Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19236709›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2009

PEMer: a computational framework with simulation-based error models for inferring genomic structural variants from massive paired-end sequencing data.

Jan O Korbel, Alexej Abyzov, Xinmeng Jasmine Mu, Nicholas Carriero, Philip Cayting, Zhengdong Zhang, Michael Snyder, Mark B Gerstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Progress in Methods for Copy Number Variation Profiling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Structural variation in the sequencing era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan O KorbelGene Expression Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Meyerhofstr, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany. korbel@embl.de
Alexej Abyzov
Xinmeng Jasmine Mu
Nicholas Carriero
Philip Cayting
Zhengdong Zhang
Michael Snyder
Mark B Gerstein

Funding

YALE BIOMEDICAL SUPERCOMPUTER: NEUROSCIENCES10RR019895 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, KENNETH ROBERT · 2004 to 2004
$1.6M
NCRR NIH HHS RR19895-02NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR019895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personal-genomics endeavors, such as the 1000 Genomes project, are generating maps of genomic structural variants by analyzing ends of massively sequenced genome fragments. To process these we developed Paired-End Mapper (PEMer; http://sv.gersteinlab.org/pemer). This comprises an analysis pipeline, compatible with several next-generation sequencing platforms; simulation-based error models, yielding confidence-values for each structural variant; and a back-end database. The simulations demonstrated high structural variant reconstruction efficiency for PEMer's coverage-adjusted multi-cutoff scoring-strategy and showed its relative insensitivity to base-calling errors.

Indexed as

Genomic Structural VariationModels, GeneticBase SequenceComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGenomeGenomicsInternetSoftware

Identifiers

PMID19236709
PMCPMC2688268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.