Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19235166›Full record

ArticleProteomics2009

Combined analysis of transcriptome and proteome data as a tool for the identification of candidate biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma.

Barbara Seliger, Sven P Dressler, Ena Wang, Roland Kellner, Christian V Recktenwald, Friedrich Lottspeich, Francesco M Marincola, Maja Baumgärtner, Derek Atkins, Rudolf Lichtenfels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MicroRNAs in liver disease.Gastroenterology · 2012
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metabolic profiling reveals key metabolic features of renal cell carcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Barbara SeligerMartin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Medical Immunology, Halle, Germany. barbara.seliger@medizin.uni-halle.de
Sven P Dressler
Ena Wang
Roland Kellner
Christian V Recktenwald
Friedrich Lottspeich
Francesco M Marincola
Maja Baumgärtner
Derek Atkins
Rudolf Lichtenfels

Funding

Immunogenetic Study of Infectious Diseases and CancerZ01CL002118 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2007 to 2008
$1.4M
Immunogenetics of Vaccine TherapyZIACL002115 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2009 to 2010
$0k
Immunogenetic Study of Infectious Diseases and CancerZIACL002118 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2009 to 2012
$0k
Immunogenetics of Vaccine TherapyZ01CL002115 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARINCOLA, FRANCESCO M · 2003 to 2005
–
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL002118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results obtained from expression profilings of renal cell carcinoma using different "ome"-based approaches and comprehensive data analysis demonstrated that proteome-based technologies and cDNA microarray analyses complement each other during the discovery phase for disease-related candidate biomarkers. The integration of the respective data revealed the uniqueness and complementarities of the different technologies. While comparative cDNA microarray analyses though restricted to up-regulated targets largely revealed genes involved in controlling gene/protein expression (19%) and signal transduction processes (13%), proteomics/PROTEOMEX-defined candidate biomarkers include enzymes of the cellular metabolism (36%), transport proteins (12%), and cell motility/structural molecules (10%). Candidate biomarkers defined by proteomics and PROTEOMEX are frequently shared, whereas the sharing rate between cDNA microarray and proteome-based profilings is limited. Putative candidate biomarkers provide insights into their cellular (dys)function and their diagnostic/prognostic value but still warrant further validation in larger patient numbers. Based on the fact that merely three candidate biomarkers were shared by all applied technologies, namely annexin A4, tubulin alpha-1A chain, and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1, the analysis at a single hierarchical level of biological regulation seems to provide only limited results thus emphasizing the importance and benefit of performing rather combinatorial screenings which can complement the standard clinical predictors.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalEpitheliumFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, NeoplasmHumansImmunohistochemistryKidneyKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID19235166
PMCPMC3410642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.