Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19234606›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Molecular evolution of immune genes in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Tovi Lehmann, Jen C C Hume, Monica Licht, Christopher S Burns, Kurt Wollenberg, Fred Simard, Jose' M C Ribeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The potential for adaptive maintenance of diversity in insect antimicrobial peptides.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Evolutionary genetics of insect innate immunity.Briefings in functional genomics · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tovi LehmannDivision of Parasitic Diseases, Entomology Branch, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Chamblee, Georgia, United States of America. TLehmann@niaid.nih.gov
Jen C C Hume
Monica Licht
Christopher S Burns
Kurt Wollenberg
Fred Simard
Jose' M C Ribeiro

Funding

Mali International Center for Excellence in Research: Vectors and Hosts of Parasitic Infectious DiseasesZIAAI001062 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI LEHMANN, TOVI · 2009 to 2025
$17.3M
Studies on Arthropod Vectors of DiseaseZIAAI000629 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI GWADZ, ROBERT · 2009 to 2014
$5.7M
Vector-Borne Diseases: Biology Of Vector Host RelationshipZ01AI000810 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI RIBEIRO, JOSE M · 1997 to 2008
$3.5M
POPULATION BIOLOGY OF ANOPHELES GAMBIAE IN AFRICAZ01AI000629 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI GWADZ, ROBERT · 1992 to 2008
$3.4M
Mali International Center for Excellence in Research: Malaria ResearchZ01AI001062 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI WELLEMS, THOMAS E · 2008 to 2008
$1.4M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs pathogens that circumvent the host immune response are favoured by selection, so are host alleles that reduce parasite load. Such evolutionary processes leave their signature on the genes involved. Deciphering modes of selection operating on immune genes might reveal the nature of host-pathogen interactions and factors that govern susceptibility in host populations. Such understanding would have important public health implications. METHODOLOGY/

findingsWe analyzed polymorphisms in four mosquito immune genes (SP14D1, GNBP, defensin, and gambicin) to decipher selection effects, presumably mediated by pathogens. Using samples of Anopheles arabiensis, An. quadriannulatus and four An. gambiae populations, as well as published sequences from other Culicidae, we contrasted patterns of polymorphisms between different functional units of the same gene within and between populations. Our results revealed selection signatures operating on different time scales. At the most recent time scale, within-population diversity revealed purifying selection. Between populations and between species variation revealed reduced differentiation (GNBP and gambicin) at coding vs. noncoding- regions, consistent with balancing selection. McDonald-Kreitman tests between An. quadriannulatus and both sibling species revealed higher fixation rate of synonymous than nonsynonymous substitutions (GNBP) in accordance with frequency dependent balancing selection. At the longest time scale (>100 my), PAML analysis using distant Culicid taxa revealed positive selection at one codon in gambicin. Patterns of genetic variation were independent of exposure to human pathogens. SIGNIFICANCE AND

conclusionsPurifying selection is the most common form of selection operating on immune genes as it was detected on a contemporary time scale on all genes. Selection for "hypervariability" was not detected, but negative balancing selection, detected at a recent evolutionary time scale between sibling species may be rather common. Detection of positive selection at the deepest evolutionary time scale suggests that it occurs infrequently, possibly in association with speciation events. Our results provided no evidence to support the hypothesis that selection was mediated by pathogens that are transmitted to humans.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, InsectAnimalsAnophelesHumansImmunityPolymorphism, GeneticSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID19234606
PMCPMC2642720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.