Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19234478›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2009

Epigenetic inheritance during the cell cycle.

Aline V Probst, Elaine Dunleavy, Geneviève Almouzni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 392 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
392citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

392 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Basic Epigenetic Mechanisms.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  16. Widespread genomicEpigenetics · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

332 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aline V ProbstLaboratory of Nuclear Dynamics and Genome Plasticity, UMR218 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France.
Elaine Dunleavy
Geneviève Almouzni

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies that concern the mechanism of DNA replication have provided a major framework for understanding genetic transmission through multiple cell cycles. Recent work has begun to gain insight into possible means to ensure the stable transmission of information beyond just DNA, and has led to the concept of epigenetic inheritance. Considering chromatin-based information, key candidates have arisen as epigenetic marks, including DNA and histone modifications, histone variants, non-histone chromatin proteins, nuclear RNA as well as higher-order chromatin organization. Understanding the dynamics and stability of these marks through the cell cycle is crucial in maintaining a given chromatin state.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCell CycleChromatinDNA MethylationDNA ReplicationGenetic MarkersHistonesHumansModels, GeneticChromatinGenetic MarkersHistones

Identifiers

PMID19234478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.