Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19234202›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2009

Rapid dendritic cell mobilization to the large intestinal epithelium is associated with resistance to Trichuris muris infection.

Sheena M Cruickshank, Matthew L Deschoolmeester, Marcus Svensson, Gareth Howell, Aikaterini Bazakou, Larisa Logunova, Matthew C Little, Nicholas English, Matthias Mack, Richard K Grencis and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. The role of βBMC immunology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Heterogeneity across the murine small and large intestine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheena M CruickshankFaculty of Life Sciences, Michael Smith Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. Sheena.Cruickshank@manchester.ac.uk
Matthew L Deschoolmeester
Marcus Svensson
Gareth Howell
Aikaterini Bazakou
Larisa Logunova
Matthew C Little
Nicholas English
Matthias Mack
Richard K Grencis
Kathryn J Else
Simon R Carding
University of Manchester · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 081120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The large intestine is a major site of infection and disease, yet little is known about how immunity is initiated within this site and the role of dendritic cells (DCs) in this process. We used the well-established model of Trichuris muris infection to investigate the innate response of colonic DCs in mice that are inherently resistant or susceptible to infection. One day postinfection, there was a significant increase in the number of immature colonic DCs in resistant but not susceptible mice. This increase was sustained at day 7 postinfection in resistant mice when the majority of the DCs were mature. There was no increase in DC numbers in susceptible mice until day 13 postinfection. In resistant mice, most colonic DCs were located in or adjacent to the epithelium postinfection. There were also marked differences in the expression of colonic epithelial chemokines in resistant mice and susceptible mice. Resistant mice had significantly increased levels of epithelium-derived CCL2, CCL3, CCL5, and CCL20 compared with susceptible mice. Furthermore, administering neutralizing CCL5 and CCL20 Abs to resistant mice prevented DC recruitment. This study provides clear evidence of differences in the kinetics of DC responses in hosts inherently resistant and susceptible to infection. DC responses in the colon correlate with resistance to infection. Differences in the production of DC chemotactic chemokines by colonic epithelial cells in response to infection in resistant vs susceptible mice may explain the different kinetics of the DC response.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsCell CommunicationCell MovementCells, CulturedDendritic CellsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseIntestinal MucosaIntestine, LargeMiceMice, Inbred AKRMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLTrichuriasisTrichuris

Identifiers

PMID19234202
PMCPMC2671799
OpenAlexW2106959242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.