Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19233938›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2009

Use of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody in a pharmacokinetic strategy to increase the efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Dhaval K Shah, Beom Soo Shin, Jean Veith, Karoly Tóth, Ralph J Bernacki, Joseph P Balthasar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Intraperitoneal bevacizumab combined with cytoreductive surgery: a pre-clinical study of tolerance and pharmacokinetics in an animal model.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dhaval K ShahDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Beom Soo Shin
Jean Veith
Karoly Tóth
Ralph J Bernacki
Joseph P Balthasar
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USCatholic University of Daegu · KR

Funding

Pharmacokinetic strategies to optimize IP chemotherapyR01CA118213 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BALTHASAR, JOSEPH P · 2006 to 2009
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA118213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancers is limited by poor penetration of drug into peritoneal tumors. Based on pharmacokinetic theory that suggests that penetration depth is primarily determined by the rate of drug removal via tumor capillaries, we have hypothesized that co-administration of antiangiogenic therapy will allow for decreased drug removal, increased drug concentrations in tumor, and increased efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Pharmacokinetic modeling was conducted to simulate the effect of tumor blood flow on tumor concentrations of topotecan. Simulations predicted that tumor blood flow reductions, as potentially achieved by antiangiogenic therapy, would lead to substantial increases in tumor concentrations after intraperitoneal chemotherapy but would lead to a slight decrease after systemic chemotherapy. Pharmacokinetic studies performed using the A2780 xenograft tumor model showed that animals receiving combined intraperitoneal topotecan and an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody had approximately 6.5-fold higher (p = 0.0015) tumor topotecan concentrations compared with animals receiving intraperitoneal topotecan alone, whereas there was no significant (p = 0.16) difference for systemic topotecan. Therapeutic studies conducted with two different drugs, topotecan and cisplatin, showed that animals receiving combined intraperitoneal chemotherapy and anti-VEGF therapy displayed superior survival relative to animals treated with chemotherapy alone (i.e., cisplatin or topotecan), anti-VEGF alone, or intravenous chemotherapy with concomitant anti-VEGF therapy. Combined intraperitoneal topotecan and anti-VEGF resulted in the complete cure of four of 11 mice. The proposed combination of antiangiogenic therapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, which was predicted to be beneficial by pharmacokinetic simulations, may provide substantial benefit to patients with peritoneal malignancies.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCisplatinComputer SimulationInjections, IntraperitonealInjections, SubcutaneousMiceMice, NudeNeovascularization, PathologicPeritoneal NeoplasmsTissue DistributionTopotecanAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinTopotecanVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Avascular endothelial growth factor A, mouse

Identifiers

PMID19233938
PMCPMC2672874
OpenAlexW2030953740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.