Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19232127›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2009

Diagnostic value of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies in a large monocentric cohort.

Katharina Hanke, Cornelia Dähnrich, Claudia S Brückner, Dörte Huscher, Mike Becker, Anthonina Jansen, Wolfgang Meyer, Karl Egerer, Falk Hiepe, Gerd R Burmester and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systemic Sclerosis-Specific Antibodies: Novel and Classical Biomarkers.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Performance of Anti-Topoisomerase I Antibody Testing by Multiple-Bead, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Immunodiffusion in a University Setting.Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. N-TproBNP as biomarker in systemic sclerosis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2012
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina HankeDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin 10117, Germany. Katharina.Hanke@charite.de
Cornelia Dähnrich
Claudia S Brückner
Dörte Huscher
Mike Becker
Anthonina Jansen
Wolfgang Meyer
Karl Egerer
Falk Hiepe
Gerd R Burmester
Wolfgang Schlumberger
Gabriela Riemekasten
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEuroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika (Germany) · DEGerman Rheumatism Research Centre · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the present study, the detection of anti-topoisomerase I (anti-topo I) autoantibodies was evaluated for diagnosis and risk assessment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients in a well characterized large monocentric cohort.

methodsSera from patients with SSc (diffuse n = 96, limited n = 113), from patients with overlap syndromes (n = 51), from patients with other diseases associated with SSc (n = 20), as well as from disease controls (n = 487) were analysed for the presence of anti-topo I antibodies by line immunoblot assay and ELISA. Assessment of organ manifestations was performed as proposed by the European Scleroderma Trial and Research network.

resultsThe applied test systems for the detection of anti-topo I antibodies revealed a diagnostic sensitivity for SSc of approximately 24% and a diagnostic specificity of at least 99.6%. The sensitivity to identify patients with diffuse SSc amounted to 60%. Patients with anti-topo I antibodies showed a higher burden of skin and lung fibrosis, contractures, electrocardiogram changes, as well as digital ulcers and had more active disease than antibody-negative patients. Signal strengths correlated only weakly with disease activity, with modified Rodnan skin score, with predicted forced vital capacity, and with predicted diffusion capacity levels (P = 0.01, rho = 0.234, rho = 0.413, rho = -0.215, rho = -0.219). High signal intensities were associated with an increased mortality in diffuse SSc patients (P = 0.003).

conclusionsDiagnosis and risk assessment of SSc patients can be supported by the detection of anti-topo I antibodies. Signal intensities as obtained by line immunoblot assay or ELISA can be used as a surrogate marker for fibrosis, active disease and worse prognosis.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesAutoantigensBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesDNA Topoisomerases, Type IEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoblottingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisScleroderma, SystemicSensitivity and SpecificityAutoantibodiesAutoantigensBiomarkersDNA Topoisomerases, Type I

Identifiers

PMID19232127
PMCPMC2688262
OpenAlexW2153546898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.