Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19232100›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2009

ARC (NSC 188491) has identical activity to Sangivamycin (NSC 65346) including inhibition of both P-TEFb and PKC.

Luke H Stockwin, Sherry X Yu, Howard Stotler, Melinda G Hollingshead, Dianne L Newton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Putative role of natural products as Protein Kinase C modulator in different disease conditions.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luke H StockwinDevelopmental Therapeutics Program, SAIC-Frederick Inc, NCI- Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. Stockwin@ncifcrf.gov
Sherry X Yu
Howard Stotler
Melinda G Hollingshead
Dianne L Newton
Science Applications International Corporation (United States) · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nucleoside analog, ARC (NSC 188491) is a recently characterized transcriptional inhibitor that selectively kills cancer cells and has the ability to perturb angiogenesis in vitro. In this study, the mechanism of action of ARC was further investigated by comparing in vitro and in vivo activity with other anti-neoplastic purines.

methodsStructure-based homology searches were used to identify those compounds with similarity to ARC. Comparator compounds were then evaluated alongside ARC in the context of viability, cell cycle and apoptosis assays to establish any similarities. Following this, biological overlap was explored in detail using gene-expression analysis and kinase inhibition assays.

resultsResults demonstrated that sangivamycin, an extensively characterized pro-apoptotic nucleoside isolated from Streptomyces, had identical activity to ARC in terms of 1) cytotoxicity assays, 2) ability to induce a G2/M block, 3) inhibitory effects on RNA/DNA/protein synthesis, 4) transcriptomic response to treatment, 5) inhibition of protein kinase C, 6) inhibition of positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb), 7) inhibition of VEGF secretion, and 8) activity within hollow fiber assays. Extending ARC activity to PKC inhibition provides a molecular basis for ARC cancer selectivity and anti-angiogenic effects. Furthermore, functional overlap between ARC and sangivamycin suggests that development of ARC may benefit from a retrospective of previous sangivamycin clinical trials. However, ARC was found to be inactive in several xenograft models, likely a consequence of rapid serum clearance.

conclusionOverall, these data expand on the biological properties of ARC but suggest additional studies are required before it can be considered a clinical trials candidate.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticApoptosisCell CycleCell Line, TumorDNA, NeoplasmDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHL-60 CellsHumansMiceNeoplasm ProteinsNucleosidesPhosphorylationPositive Transcriptional Elongation Factor BProtein Kinase CProtein Kinase Inhibitors4-amino-6-hydrazino-7-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-7H-pyrrolo(2,3-d)-pyrimidine-5-carboxamideAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDNA, NeoplasmNeoplasm ProteinsNucleosidesPositive Transcriptional Elongation Factor BProtein Kinase CProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidine NucleosidesPyrimidinesRNA, NeoplasmRNA Polymerase IIsangivamycinVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID19232100
PMCPMC2651907
OpenAlexW1995189098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.