ArticleBMC cancer2009
Role of BRCA2 mutation status on overall survival among breast cancer patients from Sardinia.
Article in BMC cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association between BRCA mutational status and survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Pooled it
- BRCA mutations and survival in breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Worse breast cancer prognosis of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: what's the evidence? A systematic review with meta-analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Effects of BRCA1- and BRCA2-related mutations on ovarian and breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015Pooled it
- Genetic risk and clinical implications of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Turkish triple-negative breast cancer patients.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring the promoter regions of cancer predisposition genes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer reveals the presence of rare germline variants.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Article
- The Role of PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gynecologic Malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2013Review
- DHPLC/SURVEYOR nuclease: a sensitive, rapid and affordable method to analyze BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer families.Molecular biotechnology · 2012Article
- The role of BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2010Review
- Role of key-regulator genes in melanoma susceptibility and pathogenesis among patients from South Italy.BMC cancer · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGermline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have been demonstrated to increase the risk of developing breast cancer. Conversely, the impact of BRCA mutations on prognosis and survival of breast cancer patients is still debated. In this study, we investigated the role of such mutations on breast cancer-specific survival among patients from North Sardinia.
methodsAmong incident cases during the period 1997-2002, a total of 512 breast cancer patients gave their consent to undergo BRCA mutation screening by DHPLC analysis and automated DNA sequencing. The Hakulinen, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression methods were used for both relative survival assessment and statistical analysis.
resultsIn our series, patients carrying a germline mutation in coding regions and splice boundaries of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were 48/512 (9%). Effect on overall survival was evaluated taking into consideration BRCA2 carriers, who represented the vast majority (44/48; 92%) of mutation-positive patients. A lower breast cancer-specific overall survival rate was observed in BRCA2 mutation carriers after the first two years from diagnosis. However, survival rates were similar in both groups after five years from diagnosis. No significant difference was found for age of onset, disease stage, and primary tumour histopathology between the two subsets.
conclusionIn Sardinian breast cancer population, BRCA2 was the most affected gene and the effects of BRCA2 germline mutations on patients' survival were demonstrated to vary within the first two years from diagnosis. After a longer follow-up observation, breast cancer-specific rates of death were instead similar for BRCA2 mutation carriers and non-carriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.