Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19231294›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain2009

Antinociceptive effects of nociceptin/orphanin FQ administered intrathecally in monkeys.

Mei-Chuan Ko, Norah N Naughton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of NOP-Related Ligands in Nonhuman Primates.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  17. ORLJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mei-Chuan KoDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5632, USA. mko@umich.edu
Norah N Naughton
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Intrathecal Opioid-Induced PruritusR01DA013685 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KO, MEI-CHUAN · 2001 to 2003
$735k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledNociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is the endogenous peptide for the NOP receptors. Depending on the doses, intrathecal administration of N/OFQ has dual actions (ie, hyperalgesia and antinociception) in rodents. However, the pharmacological profile of intrathecal N/OFQ is not fully known in primates. The aim of this study was to investigate behavioral effects of intrathecal N/OFQ over a wide dose range and to compare its effects with ligands known to produce hyperalgesia or antinociception in monkeys. Intrathecal N/OFQ from 1 fmol to 1 nmol did not produce any hyperalgesic or scratching responses. In contrast, intrathecal substance P 100 nmol produced hyperalgesia, and intrathecal DAMGO 10 nmol produced antinociception. At the dose range between 10 nmol and 1 micromol, intrathecal N/OFQ dose-dependently produced thermal antinociception against a noxious stimulus in 2 intensities. More importantly, N/OFQ in combined with intrathecal morphine dose-dependently potentiated morphine-induced antinociception without inhibiting morphine-induced itch/scratching. Taken together, this study is the first to provide a unique functional profile of intrathecal N/OFQ over a wide dose range in primates. Intrathecal N/OFQ produces thermal antinociception without anti-morphine actions or scratching responses, indicating that N/OFQ or NOP receptor agonists represent a promising target as spinal analgesics. PERSPECTIVE: Intrathecal administration of N/OFQ only produced thermal antinociception, not hyperalgesia, in monkeys. In addition, intrathecal N/OFQ does not have anti-morphine actions or itch/scratching responses. This study strongly supports the therapeutic potential of N/OFQ or NOP receptor agonists as spinal analgesics for clinical trials.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SynergismEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-FemaleHyperalgesiaInjections, SpinalMacaca mulattaMaleMorphineNociceptinOpioid PeptidesPain MeasurementAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidEnkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-MorphineNociceptinOpioid PeptidesReceptors, OpioidSubstance P

Identifiers

PMID19231294
PMCPMC2797530
OpenAlexW2121920563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.