Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19229530›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2009

Comparison of pharmacokinetic profile of levodopa throughout the day between levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone and levodopa/carbidopa when administered four or five times daily.

Mikko Kuoppamäki, Kirsi Korpela, Reijo Marttila, Valtteri Kaasinen, Päivi Hartikainen, Jukka Lyytinen, Seppo Kaakkola, Jutta Hänninen, Eliisa Löyttyniemi, Marita Kailajärvi and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effect of Opicapone on Levodopa Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Fluctuating Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Extended-release oral capsule of carbidopa-levodopa in Parkinson disease.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018
    Review
  19. Pharmacokinetics of RytaryClinical pharmacokinetics · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Mikko KuoppamäkiOrion Pharma, Clinical R&D, CNS, P.O. Box 425, Turku 20101, Finland. mikko.kuoppamaki@orionpharma.com
Kirsi Korpela
Reijo Marttila
Valtteri Kaasinen
Päivi Hartikainen
Jukka Lyytinen
Seppo Kaakkola
Jutta Hänninen
Eliisa Löyttyniemi
Marita Kailajärvi
Päivi Ruokoniemi
Juha Ellmén
Orion Corporation (United Kingdom) · GBOrion Corporation (Finland) · FI358 (Finland) · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIKuopio University Hospital · FITurku PET Centre · FITurku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FIVarsinais-Suomen Sairaanhoitopiiri · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare plasma levodopa concentrations after repeated doses of levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone (LCE) and levodopa/carbidopa (LC).

methodsOpen-label, randomized, two-period, active-controlled, cross-over study with four dosing regimens: groups I and II (healthy volunteers and Parkinson's disease patients) received levodopa 100 mg or 150 mg four times daily, respectively, and groups III and IV (healthy volunteers) received the same strengths of levodopa five times daily. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters determined for levodopa included Cmin, Cmax, Cmax - Cmin, AUC, t(1/2), and tmax.

resultsIn healthy volunteers and PD patients, mean trough levels (Cmin), Cmax, and AUC of levodopa were, in general, significantly higher during LCE compared to LC administration. Compared to Cmin, Cmax, and AUC, differences between the treatments in variability of levodopa concentrations (Cmax - Cmin) were less consistent.

conclusionsThe present results on the differences in levodopa PK between LCE and LC provide a basis to evaluate the relationship of levodopa PK and the induction of motor complications in an on-going study in early Parkinson's disease using similar dosing regimens.

Indexed as

Catechol O-Methyltransferase InhibitorsAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAntiparkinson AgentsArea Under CurveCarbidopaCase-Control StudiesCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCatecholsCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsFemaleHalf-LifeAntiparkinson AgentsCarbidopaCatechol O-MethyltransferaseCatechol O-Methyltransferase InhibitorsCatecholsDrug CombinationsentacaponeLevodopaNitriles

Identifiers

PMID19229530
OpenAlexW2004480672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.