Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19229231›Full record

ArticleNature clinical practice. Endocrinology & metabolism2009

Does combined hormone replacement therapy improve the health-related quality of life of postmenopausal women?

Lila Nachtigall

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature clinical practice. Endocrinology & metabolism, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lila NachtigallDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. doctorlila@gmail.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary discusses the findings and limitations of a study by Welton et al. that assessed the effect of combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on health-related quality of life (QOL) in postmenopausal women. Evidence of the effect of HRT on health-related QOL in this group of patients in prior literature has been lacking, in part because of the varied, nonvalidated instruments used for evaluation. Welton et al. overcame that issue by the use of multiple questionnaires, and included specific questions on sexual functioning. However, all studies on health-related QOL are limited by the subjective selection of the parameters included in the instruments. Within this limitation, these authors concluded that HRT (estrogen alone in women without a uterus, and estrogen plus progestin for women with a uterus) offers more benefit than risk for postmenopausal, symptomatic women.

Identifiers

PMID19229231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.