Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19228433›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009

Genotype determination for polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium.

Zhaoxia Yu, Chad Garner, Argyrios Ziogas, Hoda Anton-Culver, Daniel J Schaid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhaoxia YuDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. yu.zhaoxia@uci.edu
Chad Garner
Argyrios Ziogas
Hoda Anton-Culver
Daniel J Schaid

Funding

Quantitative Methods for Genetic EpidemiologyR01GM065450 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SCHAID, DANIEL J. · 2002 to 2020
$5.6M
HEREDITARY BREAST CANCER--GENETIC AND MOLECULAR STUDIESR01CA058860 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI ANTON-CULVER, HODA A · 1994 to 2008
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA058860NCI NIH HHS R01 CA58860-10NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065450NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM065450Wellcome Trust 076113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide association studies with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) show great promise to identify genetic determinants of complex human traits. In current analyses, genotype calling and imputation of missing genotypes are usually considered as two separated tasks. The genotypes of SNPs are first determined one at a time from allele signal intensities. Then the missing genotypes, i.e., no-calls caused by not perfectly separated signal clouds, are imputed based on the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between multiple SNPs. Although many statistical methods have been developed to improve either genotype calling or imputation of missing genotypes, treating the two steps independently can lead to loss of genetic information.

resultsWe propose a novel genotype calling framework. In this framework, we consider the signal intensities and underlying LD structure of SNPs simultaneously by estimating both cluster parameters and haplotype frequencies. As a result, our new method outperforms some existing algorithms in terms of both call rates and genotyping accuracy. Our studies also suggest that jointly analyzing multiple SNPs in LD provides more accurate estimation of haplotypes than haplotype reconstruction methods that only use called genotypes.

conclusionOur study demonstrates that jointly analyzing signal intensities and LD structure of multiple SNPs is a better way to determine genotypes and estimate LD parameters.

Indexed as

GenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideComputational BiologyLinkage Disequilibrium

Identifiers

PMID19228433
PMCPMC2753842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.