ArticleJournal of bioinformatics and computational biology2009
Co-expression among constituents of a motif in the protein-protein interaction network.
Article in Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heterodimer Binding Scaffolds Recognition via the Analysis of Kinetically Hot Residues.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- iCAVE: an open source tool for visualizing biomolecular networks in 3D, stereoscopic 3D and immersive 3D.GigaScience · 2017Article
- Extra Large G-Protein Interactome Reveals Multiple Stress Response Function and Partner-Dependent XLG Subcellular Localization.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- A matrix rank based concordance index for evaluating and detecting conditional specific co-expressed gene modules.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Dynamic modularity of host protein interaction networks in Salmonella Typhi infection.PloS one · 2014Article
- An integrative network algorithm identifies age-associated differential methylation interactome hotspots targeting stem-cell differentiation pathways.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Arabidopsis G-protein interactome reveals connections to cell wall carbohydrates and morphogenesis.Molecular systems biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Almost all cellular functions are the results of well-coordinated interactions between various proteins. A more connected hub or motif in the interaction network is expected to be more important, and any perturbation in this motif would be more damaging to the smooth performance of the related functions. Thus, some coherent robustness of these hubs has to be derived. Here, we provide the global evidence that interaction hubs obtain their robustness against uneven protein concentrations through co-expression of the constituents, and that the degree of co-expression correlates strongly with the complexity of the embedded motif. We calculated the gene expression correlations between the proteins embedded in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-node interaction motifs of increasing complexities, and compared them to those between proteins from random motifs of similar complexities. We find that as the connectedness of these motifs increases, there is higher co-expression between the constituent proteins. For example, when the expression correlation is 0.7, the kernel density of the correlation increases from 0.152 for 4-node motifs with three edges to 0.403 for 4-node cliques. This implies that the robustness of the interaction system emerges from a proportionate synchronicity among the constituents of the motif via co-expression. We further show that such biological coherence via co-expression of component proteins can be reinforced by integrating conservation data in the analysis. For example, with addition of evolutionary information from other genomes, the ratio of kernel density for interaction and random data in the case of 5- and 6-node cliques in yeast increases from 37.8 to 123 and 98.4 to 1300, respectively, given that the expression correlation is 0.8. Our results show that genes whose products are involved in motifs have transcription and translation properties that minimize the noise in final protein concentrations, compared to random sets of genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.