Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19226470›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2009

Evolution of the sugar receptors in insects.

Lauren B Kent, Hugh M Robertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sugar-sensing swodkoreceptors and swodkocrine signaling.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Insects · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Identification and Expression Patterns ofFrontiers in physiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauren B KentDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 61801, USA. lkent@life.uiuc.edu
Hugh M Robertson

Funding

Gustatory and olfactory receptors of Anopheles gambiaeR01AI056081 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ROBERTSON, HUGH M. · 2003 to 2006
$1.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI056081NIAID NIH HHS R01AI56081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerception of sugars is an invaluable ability for insects which often derive quickly accessible energy from these molecules. A distinctive subfamily of eight proteins within the gustatory receptor (Gr) family has been identified as sugar receptors (SRs) in Drosophila melanogaster (Gr5a, Gr61a, and Gr64a-f). We examined the evolution of these SRs within the 12 available Drosophila genome sequences, as well as three mosquito, two moth, and beetle, bee, and wasp genome sequences.

resultsWhile most Drosophila species retain all eight genes, we find that the three Drosophila subgenus species have lost Gr64d, while D. grimshawi and the D. pseudoobscura/persimilis sibling species have also lost Gr5a function. The entire Gr64 gene complex was also duplicated in the D. grimshawi lineage, but only one potentially functional copy of each gene has been retained. The numbers of SRs range from two in the hymenopterans Apis mellifera and Nasonia vitripennis to 16 in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. An unusual aspect is the evolution of a novel exon from intronic sequence in an expanded set of four SRs in Bombyx mori (BmGr5-8), which appears to be the first example of such exonization in insects. Twelve intron gains and 63 losses are inferred within the SR family.

conclusionExamination of the SRs in these fly, mosquito, moth, beetle, and hymenopteran genome sequences reveals that they appear to have originated independently from single ancestral genes within the dipteran and coleopteran lineages, and two genes in the lepidopteran and hymenopteran lineages. The origin of the insect SRs will eventually be illuminated by additional basal insect and arthropod genome sequences.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsExonsGenes, InsectGenome, InsectInsectaIntronsModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPhylogenyReceptors, Cell SurfaceSequence AlignmentDrosophila Proteinsgustatory receptor, DrosophilaReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID19226470
PMCPMC2667405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.