Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19226439›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2009

Protein function annotation by homology-based inference.

Yaniv Loewenstein, Domenico Raimondo, Oliver C Redfern, James Watson, Dmitrij Frishman, Michal Linial, Christine Orengo, Janet Thornton, Anna Tramontano

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multitask Learning-Based Approaches for Protein Function Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. SHARK enables sensitive detection of evolutionary homologs and functional analogs in unalignable and disordered sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Investigating theACS omega · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Yaniv LoewensteinDepartment of Biological Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Sudarsky Center, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Domenico Raimondo
Oliver C Redfern
James Watson
Dmitrij Frishman
Michal Linial
Christine Orengo
Janet Thornton
Anna Tramontano
European Bioinformatics Institute · GBHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology · GBSapienza University of Rome · ITHelmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With many genomes now sequenced, computational annotation methods to characterize genes and proteins from their sequence are increasingly important. The BioSapiens Network has developed tools to address all stages of this process, and here we review progress in the automated prediction of protein function based on protein sequence and structure.

Indexed as

Sequence Homology, Amino AcidComputational BiologyProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID19226439
PMCPMC2688287
OpenAlexW2110115297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.