ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2009
Development of a mini 3D cell culture system using well defined nickel grids for the investigation of cell scaffold interactions.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The interactions of astrocytes and fibroblasts with defined pore structures in static and perfusion cultures.Biomaterials · 2011Article
- Modeling tissue growth within nonwoven scaffolds pores.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A bioreactor system was developed using a series of fine mesh nickel grids as free standing scaffolds to investigate the behaviours of fibroblasts and keratinocytes in tissue culture. It was found that the mesh size of the suspended grids, but not of the grids that attached to tissue culture surface, had significant influences on cell behaviour and there was a maximum size for fibroblast to span within the defined culture period. Time lapse video microscopy demonstrated fibroblasts cultured on these grids initially migrated onto the struts but then worked together to fill in the voids between struts with a membranous sheet of tissue. In contrast keratinocytes barely migrated from the initial site of cell deposition and when they moved (to a modest extent) it was as an integrated sheet of cells. Similar results were observed when both types of cells were co-cultured in the system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19225869What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.