Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19225820›Full record

ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2009

Hox cluster duplication in the basal teleost Hiodon alosoides (Osteoglossomorpha).

Karen E Chambers, Ryan McDaniell, Jeremy D Raincrow, Maya Deshmukh, Peter F Stadler, Chi-hua Chiu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A new model army: Emerging fish models to study the genomics of vertebrate Evo-Devo.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2015
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evolution of Hox gene clusters in deuterostomes.BMC developmental biology · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Complete HOX cluster characterization of the coelacanth provides further evidence for slow evolution of its genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Karen E ChambersDepartment of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA. kchamber@wiley.com
Ryan McDaniell
Jeremy D Raincrow
Maya Deshmukh
Peter F Stadler
Chi-hua Chiu
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale--even genome-wide--duplications have repeatedly been invoked as an explanation for major radiations. Teleosts, the most species-rich vertebrate clade, underwent a "fish-specific genome duplication" (FSGD) that is shared by most ray-finned fish lineages. We investigate here the Hox complement of the goldeye (Hiodon alosoides), a representative of Osteoglossomorpha, the most basal teleostean clade. An extensive PCR survey reveals that goldeye has at least eight Hox clusters, indicating a duplicated genome compared to basal actinopterygians. The possession of duplicated Hox clusters is uncoupled to species richness. The Hox system of the goldeye is substantially different from that of other teleost lineages, having retained several duplicates of Hox genes for which crown teleosts have lost at least one copy. A detailed analysis of the PCR fragments as well as full length sequences of two HoxA13 paralogs, and HoxA10 and HoxC4 genes places the duplication event close in time to the divergence of Osteoglossomorpha and crown teleosts. The data are consistent with-but do not conclusively prove-that Osteoglossomorpha shares the FSGD.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenes, HomeoboxGenetic SpeciationAnimalsBase SequenceDNAEvolution, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPerciformesPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence AlignmentDNA

Identifiers

PMID19225820
PMCPMC2683926
OpenAlexW2018643888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.