ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2009
[Outpatient smoking cessation: a report on 3,260 cases].
Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Consequences of hospitalisations on smoking behaviour in psychiatric and somatic inpatients].Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2014Article
- [Smoking].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total number of 3,260 smokers were included into a 4-week smoking cessation programme of the Regional Sickness Fund of Lower Austria in which participants were coached by health care professionals. The smoking status of each subject, as determined by measuring expired CO, resulted in a success rate of 70.6% (non-smokers and persons with smoking reduction). Success rates were emerged to increase with decreasing level of baseline nicotine dependence (determined with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence = FTND). Even in the group of heavily dependent smokers, however, (FTND Score 8-10) a non-smoking rate of 33.9% was achieved. Moreover, an additional 27.6% of the persons of this group had reduced the number of cigarettes smoked daily. The positive effect of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) could be demonstrated by the high rate of 69.3% non-smokers in this group of participants, which was clearly higher than in participants who did not use NRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.