Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19225720›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2009

Phase II trial of fenretinide (NSC 374551) in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer.

Bryan J Schneider, Francis P Worden, Shirish M Gadgeel, Ralph E Parchment, Collette M Hodges, James Zwiebel, Rodney L Dunn, Antoinette J Wozniak, Michael J Kraut, Gregory P Kalemkerian

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeting Sphingolipids for Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan J SchneiderDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, J-321, New York, NY 10021, USA. bjs2004@med.cornell.edu
Francis P Worden
Shirish M Gadgeel
Ralph E Parchment
Collette M Hodges
James Zwiebel
Rodney L Dunn
Antoinette J Wozniak
Michael J Kraut
Gregory P Kalemkerian
Michigan Medicine · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USCornell University · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · USProvidence Hospital · USU-M Rogel Cancer CenterUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlterations in retinoid signaling appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Fenretinide [N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide], a synthetic retinoid, inhibits the growth of SCLC cells in vitro via the induction of apoptosis. Since these data suggested that SCLC is the adult solid tumor that is most susceptible to fenretinide, a trial to evaluate the clinical activity of fenretinide in patients with SCLC was considered the definitive test of its clinical potential in adult oncology.

methodsPatients with progressive SCLC after one or two prior chemotherapy regimens and a performance status of 0-2 were eligible for the study. Patients with stable, treated brain metastases were eligible. Fenretinide 900 mg/m(2) twice daily was administered orally on days 1-7 of each 21-day cycle. Blood and saliva were collected pre-treatment and on day 7 of cycle 1 to measure fenretinide and retinol levels by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC).

resultsNineteen patients were enrolled. Fifteen patients had one prior chemotherapy regimen and four patients had two prior regimens. The median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 10 months. A median of two cycles of fenretinide was administered. There were no objective responses, but four of 17 evaluable patients (24%) had stable disease after 2-17 cycles. The median time to treatment failure was 5.7 weeks overall, while the four patients with stable disease demonstrated treatment failure at 11, 13, 19, and 52 weeks. Median survival was 25 weeks, with one patient alive 22 months after the start of treatment. The 1-year survival rate was 29%. Toxicity included mild, reversible visual changes (haziness, altered night vision), grade 1-3 nausea/vomiting, and grade 1-2 diarrhea. The mean day 7 plasma fenretinide level was 2.90 +/- 1.66 μg/ml (7.40 +/- 4.25 muM; n = 14). The mean pre-treatment and day 7 plasma retinol levels were 0.47 +/- 0.16 μg/ml and 0.05 +/- 0.07 μg/ml (n = 8), respectively. The mean day 7 salivary fenretinide level was 0.08 +/- 0.18 μg/ml, with no correlation between salivary and plasma drug levels.

conclusionsFenretinide is well tolerated in patients with SCLC and stabilization of disease was noted in 24% of patients with this aggressive disease. However, after the first stage of enrollment, the response rate did not meet criteria to proceed with full trial accrual. Plasma concentrations of fenretinide that induce cytotoxicity in vitro in SCLC cell lines are clinically achievable, but there were no objective responses. Non-invasive drug monitoring using saliva underestimates systemic exposure.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFenretinideHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVitamin AAntineoplastic AgentsFenretinideVitamin A

Identifiers

PMID19225720
OpenAlexW2089070253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.