Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19225072›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2009

Development of an immunochromatographic test for rapid serodiagnosis of human pythiosis.

Theerapong Krajaejun, Srisurat Imkhieo, Akarin Intaramat, Kavi Ratanabanangkoon

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nucleic Acid-Based Detection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. A Review: Antimicrobial Therapy for Human Pythiosis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification and Biotyping ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theerapong KrajaejunDepartment of Pathology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. mr_en@hotmail.com
Srisurat Imkhieo
Akarin Intaramat
Kavi Ratanabanangkoon
Chulabhorn Research Institute · THRamathibodi Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human pythiosis is an emerging and life-threatening infectious disease caused by the fungus-like organism Pythium insidiosum. High rates of morbidity and mortality for patients with pythiosis are exacerbated by the lack of early diagnosis and an effective treatment. Here, we developed and evaluated an immunochromatographic test (ICT) for the diagnosis of human pythiosis, in comparison to a standard serological test of immunodiffusion (ID). Culture filtrate antigen of P. insidiosum was used to detect human anti-P. insidiosum antibody. Sheep anti-human immunoglobulin G-colloidal gold conjugate was used to generate an ICT signal. Thirty-three sera from patients with vascular (n = 27), ocular (n = 4), and cutaneous (n = 2) pythiosis and 181 control sera from healthy blood donors (n = 100), as well as patients with a variety of infectious (n = 56) and noninfectious (n = 25) diseases, were included in the test evaluation. The turnaround time for generating a result by the ICT was less than 30 min, while that for ID was approximately 24 h. Based on the results for all sera of pythiosis patients and the control groups, the ICT showed 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity and ID showed 61% sensitivity and 100% specificity. By both tests, false-negative results for sera from all ocular pythiosis patients were obtained. In addition, the ID test yielded false-negative results for sera from eight patients with vascular pythiosis and one patient with cutaneous pythiosis. It was concluded that the ICT is a rapid, user-friendly, and reliable serological test for the early diagnosis of vascular and cutaneous pythiosis.

Indexed as

AntibodiesChromatographyHumansImmunoassayInfectionsPythiumSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsTime FactorsAntibodies

Identifiers

PMID19225072
PMCPMC2668273
OpenAlexW2159004357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.