Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19224241›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2009

Substrate metabolism during exercise in the spinal cord injured.

Todd Anthony Astorino, Eric T Harness

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Todd Anthony AstorinoDepartment of Kinesiology, CSU, San Marcos, MH 352, 333 S. Twin Oaks Valley Rd, San Marcos, CA 92096-0001, USA. astorino@csusm.edu
Eric T Harness
California State University, San Marcos · USProject Walk Paralysis Recovery Centers · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary aim of the study was to examine substrate metabolism during combined passive and active exercise in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Nine men and women with SCI (mean age 40.6 +/- 3.4 years) completed two trials of submaximal exercise 1 week apart. Two maintained a complete injury and seven had an incomplete injury. Level of injury ranged from thoracic (T4-T6 and T10) to cervical (four C5-C6 and three C6-C7 injuries). During two bouts separated by 1 week, subjects completed two 30 min sessions of active lower-body and passive upper-body exercise, during which heart rate (HR) and gas exchange data were continuously assessed. One-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to examine differences in all variables over time. Results demonstrated significant increases (P < 0.05) in HR and oxygen uptake (VO(2)) from rest to exercise. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) significantly increased (P < 0.05) during exercise from 0.85 +/- 0.02 at rest to 0.95 +/- 0.01 at the highest cadence, reflecting increasing reliance on carbohydrate from 50.0 to 83.0% of energy metabolism. Data demonstrate a large reliance on carbohydrate utilization during 30 min of exercise in persons with SCI, with reduced contribution of lipid as exercise intensity was increased. Strategies to reduce carbohydrate utilization and increase lipid oxidation in this population should be addressed.

Indexed as

AdultCarbohydrate MetabolismCarbon DioxideEnergy MetabolismExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxidation-ReductionOxygen ConsumptionSpinal Cord InjuriesCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID19224241
OpenAlexW2128470944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.