Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19224007›Full record

ArticleThe Clinical biochemist. Reviews2009

Advances in biochemical screening for phaeochromocytoma using biogenic amines.

Malcolm J Whiting, Matthew P Doogue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Clinical biochemist. Reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comprehensive, robust, and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS analysis of free biogenic monoamines and their metabolites in urine.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Malignant catatonia mimicking pheochromocytoma.Case reports in endocrinology · 2013
    Article
  13. Screening for pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.Current hypertension reports · 2012
    Review
  14. Clinical experience with pheochromocytoma in a single centre over 16 years.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Malcolm J WhitingBiochemistry and Pharmacology Laboratory, SA Pathology at Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia. Malcolm.Whiting@health.sa.gov.au
Matthew P Doogue

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochemical testing for phaeochromocytoma is performed in diagnostic laboratories using a variety of tests with plasma, serum or 24-hour urine collections. These tests include catecholamines and their methylated metabolites - the metanephrines, either individually or in combination with their sulfated metabolites. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) continues to be the dominant analytical method for biogenic amine quantitation. Chromatographic techniques are changing, with improvements in sample preparation procedures, column technology and more specific analyte detection using tandem mass spectrometry. Enrolments in quality assurance programs indicate that there are still many more laboratories in Australasia analysing urinary catecholamines than metanephrines. Nevertheless, clinical evidence and expert opinion favour metanephrines as the analytes with highest sensitivity for the detection of phaeochromocytoma. Practical issues such as better chemical stability and easier specimen collection also favour metanephrines over catecholamines. For these reasons, it is likely that laboratories increasingly will replace urine catecholamine testing with either plasma or urine metanephrines. However in interpreting positive results, the need remains to consider issues such as pre-test probability and use of potentially interfering medications.

Identifiers

PMID19224007
PMCPMC2643090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.