Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19223934›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2009

Preconceptional ancestry-based carrier couple screening for cystic fibrosis and haemoglobinopathies: what determines the intention to participate or not and actual participation?

Phillis Lakeman, Anne Marie Catharina Plass, Lidewij Henneman, Pieter Dirk Bezemer, Martina Cornelia Cornel, Leo Pieter ten Kate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016
    Article
  16. Advantages of expanded universal carrier screening: what is at stake?European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. On averages and peaks: how do people integrate attitudes about multiple diseases to reach a decision about multiplex genetic testing?Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Phillis LakemanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.lakeman@vumc.nl
Anne Marie Catharina Plass
Lidewij Henneman
Pieter Dirk Bezemer
Martina Cornelia Cornel
Leo Pieter ten Kate

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores determinants of the intention to participate or not and of actual participation in preconceptional ancestry-based carrier couple screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) and haemoglobinopathies (HbPs). In total, 9453 individuals from a multi-ethnic population were invited. Invitees who had a partner and who were planning a pregnancy were the target population (33-36%). Test participation was conditional on survey participation. Those who refrained from test participation were asked to participate in the survey only. The questionnaire was based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour, which explains behaviour through intention. It was completed by 418 survey participants: 171 who intended to participate in the testing, and 247 who refrained from test participation. Both test intenders and offer decliners generally had a positive attitude towards test participation, and perceived high behavioural control. This applied to Western and non-Western survey participants equally. Offer decliners, however, perceived less control in terms of the time and effort needed for participation. Still, 68% of them intended to participate in the future if the screening would be offered routinely. Test intenders more often would draw reproductive consequences from test results, perceived a higher risk of being a carrier, more benefits and less adverse psychological outcomes. Feelings of stigmatisation were not an important issue, but 14% thought that there would be discrimination against carriers: among them more were non-Western survey participants. Preconceptional ancestry-based CF and HbPs carrier screening was evaluated as positive and desirable among Western and non-Western survey participants. The effort and time needed for participation were important reasons for declining participation, which might be overcome by improving access to the screening.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsGenetic TestingPatient ParticipationAdultAlgorithmsAttitude to HealthCystic FibrosisData CollectionFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningHemoglobinopathiesHumansIntentionMaleModels, BiologicalPreconception Care

Identifiers

PMID19223934
PMCPMC2986548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.