Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19223452›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2009

Identification of differential gene pathways with principal component analysis.

Shuangge Ma, Michael R Kosorok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ranking Novel Regulatory Genes in Gene Expression Profiles using NetExpress.Proceedings of the ... Symposium on Applied Computing. Symposium on Applied Computing · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Systems analysis of high-throughput data.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shuangge MaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. shuangge.ma@yale.edu
Michael R Kosorok

Funding

Regularized Classification & Survival Analysis for Expression Profiling of CancerR01CA120988 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HUANG, JIAN · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
Semiparametric and Empirical Process Methods in OncologyR01CA075142 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2002 to 2008
$1.1M
MULTIVARIATE GROUP SEQUENTIAL CANCER CLINICAL TRIALSR29CA075142 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 1997 to 2001
$197k
NCI NIH HHS CA075142NCI NIH HHS CA120988NCI NIH HHS R01 CA075142NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120988NCI NIH HHS R29 CA075142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationDevelopment of high-throughput technology makes it possible to measure expressions of thousands of genes simultaneously. Genes have the inherent pathway structure, where pathways are composed of multiple genes with coordinated biological functions. It is of great interest to identify differential gene pathways that are associated with the variations of phenotypes.

resultsWe propose the following approach for detecting differential gene pathways. First, we construct gene pathways using databases such as KEGG or GO. Second, for each pathway, we extract a small number of representative features, which are linear combinations of gene expressions and/or their transformations. Specifically, we propose using (i) principal components (PCs) of gene expression sets, (ii) PCs of expanded gene expression sets and (iii) expanded sets of PCs of gene expressions, as the representative features. Third, we identify differential gene pathways as those with representative features significantly associated with the variations of phenotypes, particularly disease clinical outcomes, in regression models. The false discovery rate approach is used to adjust for multiple comparisons. Analysis of three gene expression datasets suggests that (i) the proposed approach can effectively identify differential gene pathways; (ii) PCs that explain only a small amount of variations of gene expressions may bear significant associations between gene pathways and phenotypes; (iii) including second-order terms of gene expressions may lead to identification of new differential gene pathways; (iv) the proposed approach is relatively insensitive to additional noises; and (v) the proposed approach can identify gene pathways missed by alternative approaches. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticPhenotypePrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID19223452
PMCPMC2732304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.