ArticlePublic health2009
Pandethics.
Article in Public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Individual Freedom in the Initial Response to Covid-19.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Ethics of selective restriction of liberty in a pandemic.Journal of medical ethics · 2021Article
- Why should HCWs receive priority access to vaccines in a pandemic?BMC medical ethics · 2021Review
- No Jab, No Job? Ethical Issues in Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination of Healthcare Personnel.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Invisible epidemics: ethics and asymptomatic infection.Monash bioethics review · 2020Review
- Experiences of clinical first-line nurses treating patients with COVID-19: A qualitative study.Journal of nursing management · 2020Article
- Balancing the duty to treat with the duty to family in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of medical ethics · 2020Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the medico-legal and human rights of psychiatric patients.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020Article
- Prioritising access to pandemic influenza vaccine: a review of the ethics literature.BMC medical ethics · 2020Review
- Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis.Science and engineering ethics · 2016Article
- Understanding the school community's response to school closures during the H1N1 2009 influenza pandemic.BMC public health · 2013Article
- Ethical considerations for vaccination programmes in acute humanitarian emergencies.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2013Article
- Changing perceptions: of pandemic influenza and public health responses.American journal of public health · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explains the ethical importance of infectious diseases, and reviews four major ethical issues associated with pandemic influenza: the obligation of individuals to avoid infecting others, healthcare workers' 'duty to treat', allocation of scarce resources, and coercive social distancing measures. In each case, ways in which the ethical issues turn on both philosophical and empirical questions are highlighted. The paper concludes that ethicists should play a greater role in identifying ethically important empirical questions, and that scientists should take the ethical as well as the scientific importance of such questions into consideration when choosing research projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.